arXiv · 1705.03726
Logical and Algebraic Characterizations of Rational Transductions
Abstract
Rational word languages can be defined by several equivalent means: finite state automata, rational expressions, finite congruences, or monadic second-order (MSO) logic. The robust subclass of aperiodic languages is defined by: counter-free automata, star-free expressions, aperiodic (finite) congruences, or first-order (FO) logic. In particular, their algebraic characterization by aperiodic congruences allows to decide whether a regular language is aperiodic. We lift this decidability result to rational transductions, i.e., word-to-word functions defined by finite state transducers. In this context, logical and algebraic characterizations have also been proposed. Our main result is that one can decide if a rational transduction (given as a transducer) is in a given decidable congruence class. We also establish a transfer result from logic-algebra equivalences over languages to equivalences over transductions. As a consequence, it is decidable if a rational transduction is first-order definable, and we show that this problem is PSPACE-complete.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Emmanuel Filiot, Olivier Gauwin, Nathan Lhote. 2017-05-10. Logical and Algebraic Characterizations of Rational Transductions. https://doi.org/10.23638/lmcs-15(4%3A16)2019
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.