arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1705.00924

Split Packing: Algorithms for Packing Circles with Optimal Worst-Case Density

Sándor P. Fekete·Sebastian Morr·Christian Scheffer
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the classic circle packing problem, one asks whether a given set of circles can be packed into a given container. Packing problems like this have been shown to be $\mathsf{NP}$-hard. In this paper, we present new sufficient conditions for packing circles into square and triangular containers, using only the sum of the circles' areas: For square containers, it is possible to pack any set of circles with a combined area of up to approximately 53.90% of the square's area. And when the container is a right or obtuse triangle, any set of circles whose combined area does not exceed the triangle's incircle can be packed. These area conditions are tight, in the sense that for any larger areas, there are sets of circles which cannot be packed. Similar results have long been known for squares, but to the best of our knowledge, we give the first results of this type for circular objects. Our proofs are constructive: We describe a versatile, divide-and-conquer-based algorithm for packing circles into various container shapes with optimal worst-case density. It employs an elegant subdivision scheme that recursively splits the circles into two groups and then packs these into subcontainers. We call this algorithm "Split Packing". It can be used as a constant-factor approximation algorithm when looking for the smallest container in which a given set of circles can be packed, due to its polynomial runtime. A browser-based, interactive visualization of the Split Packing approach and other related material can be found at https://morr.cc/split-packing/

Explore related subjects

cs.CG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sándor P. Fekete, Sebastian Morr, Christian Scheffer. 2017-05-02. Split Packing: Algorithms for Packing Circles with Optimal Worst-Case Density. https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.00924

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2026

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2026

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG↗