Online Weighted Matching: Breaking the $\frac{1}{2}$ Barrier

Matthew Fahrbach; Morteza Zadimoghaddam

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1704.05384

Online Weighted Matching: Breaking the $\frac{1}{2}$ Barrier

Matthew Fahrbach·Morteza Zadimoghaddam

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Online matching and its variants are some of the most fundamental problems in the online algorithms literature. In this paper, we study the online weighted bipartite matching problem. Karp et al. (STOC 1990) gave an elegant algorithm in the unweighted case that achieves a tight competitive ratio of $1-1/e$. In the weighted case, however, we can easily show that no competitive ratio is obtainable without the commonly accepted free disposal assumption. Under this assumption, it is not hard to prove that the greedy algorithm is $1/2$ competitive, and that this is tight for deterministic algorithms. We present the first randomized algorithm that breaks this long-standing $1/2$ barrier and achieves a competitive ratio of at least $0.501$. In light of the hardness result of Kapralov et al. (SODA 2013) that restricts beating a $1/2$ competitive ratio for the monotone submodular welfare maximization problem, our result can be seen as strong evidence that solving the weighted bipartite matching problem is strictly easier than submodular welfare maximization in the online setting. Our approach relies on a very controlled use of randomness, which allows our algorithm to safely make adaptive decisions based on its previous assignments.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Matthew Fahrbach, Morteza Zadimoghaddam. 2017-04-18. Online Weighted Matching: Breaking the $\frac{1}{2}$ Barrier. https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.05384

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗