arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1703.04417

El Lenguaje Natural como Lenguaje Formal

Franco M. Luque
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Formal languages theory is useful for the study of natural language. In particular, it is of interest to study the adequacy of the grammatical formalisms to express syntactic phenomena present in natural language. First, it helps to draw hypothesis about the nature and complexity of the speaker-hearer linguistic competence, a fundamental question in linguistics and other cognitive sciences. Moreover, from an engineering point of view, it allows the knowledge of practical limitations of applications based on those formalisms. In this article I introduce the adequacy problem of grammatical formalisms for natural language, also introducing some formal language theory concepts required for this discussion. Then, I review the formalisms that have been proposed in history, and the arguments that have been given to support or reject their adequacy. ----- La teor\'ia de lenguajes formales es \'util para el estudio de los lenguajes naturales. En particular, resulta de inter\'es estudiar la adecuaci\'on de los formalismos gramaticales para expresar los fen\'omenos sint\'acticos presentes en el lenguaje natural. Primero, ayuda a trazar hip\'otesis acerca de la naturaleza y complejidad de las competencias ling\"u\'isticas de los hablantes-oyentes del lenguaje, un interrogante fundamental de la ling\"u\'istica y otras ciencias cognitivas. Adem\'as, desde el punto de vista de la ingenier\'ia, permite conocer limitaciones pr\'acticas de las aplicaciones basadas en dichos formalismos. En este art\'iculo hago una introducci\'on al problema de la adecuaci\'on de los formalismos gramaticales para el lenguaje natural, introduciendo tambi\'en algunos conceptos de la teor\'ia de lenguajes formales necesarios para esta discusi\'on. Luego, hago un repaso de los formalismos que han sido propuestos a lo largo de la historia, y de los argumentos que se han dado para sostener o refutar su adecuaci\'on.

Explore related subjects

cs.CLcs.FL

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Franco M. Luque. 2017-03-13. El Lenguaje Natural como Lenguaje Formal. https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.04417

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Auto-RecSys: Harnessing Autonomous Research Agents for Industry-Scale Recommender System

Auto-research agents have shown the potential to automate hypothesis generation, experiment execution, and iterative refinement. However, scaling this paradigm to industry-scale recommendation models introduces two challenges: (1) long feedback loops, where model training can take days, making serial iteration prohibitively slow and requiring parallel exploration across multiple research directions; and (2) system complexity, where large configurations, fragile infrastructure dependencies, and multi-day GPU jobs require robust and recoverable execution. We present Auto-RecSys, an autonomous research system for long-horizon experimentation on industry-scale recommendation models. Auto-RecSys addresses these challenges through three harness designs: (1) distributed asynchronous execution for running multiple experiments in parallel across servers, (2) centralized cross-server memory for persistent and recoverable execution across sessions and failures, and (3) cognitive-procedural separation, where natural-language skill files guide LLM reasoning while deterministic scripts enforce operational correctness. Auto-RecSys further employs a dual-loop self-evolving architecture: an Execution Evolution Loop in which model-specific playbooks accumulate operational knowledge by recording failed attempts and crystallizing successful pipelines, and an Idea Evolution Loop in which experimental outcomes inform subsequent ideation. Evaluated on recommendation models, Auto-RecSys significantly reduces the human time required per experiment cycle and improves execution reliability as its playbooks mature.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Structurally Speaking: Motif-Oriented Graph Captioning through Bidirectional Graph-Text Translation

Graph captions should help readers understand graph structure, rather than simply translate adjacency matrices into long textual edge lists. A useful graph caption abstracts connectivity into recognizable motifs, such as hubs, paths, cycles, cliques, and bridges, because these motifs provide compact structural units that are easier to read, compare, and recover. In this paper, we study motif-oriented graph captioning as a bidirectional graph-text translation task, where captions must both preserve enough topology for graph recovery and express the graph through concise motif-level descriptions. We show that direct prompting of GPT-5.1 often produces graph-recoverable captions by enumerating node-to-node connections, but these captions are verbose and can contain inconsistent motif interpretations. To address this gap, we introduce Structurally Speaking, a lightweight structured prompting protocol that guides translation between explicit connectivity and motif-level abstraction. Experiments on a synthetic motif-based dataset show that structured prompting produces shorter and more motif-consistent captions while maintaining comparable graph recovery. These results suggest that explicit topology-to-motif reasoning guidance can make LLM-generated graph captions more interpretable without model fine-tuning.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Using Semantic Uncertainty to Estimate Transition Relevance in Turn-taking

Turn-taking is a fundamental mechanism that governs when interlocutors speak and listen. Although Spoken Dialogue Systems (SDS) exploit a range of linguistic, acoustic, and non-verbal cues, they produce ill-timed responses in unscripted interaction. A central challenge is anticipating Transition Relevance Places (TRPs), or opportunities, not obligations, for a listener to take the floor. Human listeners do not wait for turn endings; as an utterance unfolds, they use expectations about its developing meaning to anticipate TRPs and decide whether to take the floor. We examine whether these evolving expectations can be modeled through semantic uncertainty -- an LLM-derived measure of how strongly a turn so far constrains what may plausibly come next. To do so, we sample possible continuations of an ongoing turn and use changes in semantic dispersion to identify TRPs within turns. We evaluate this account on a dataset with TRP labels derived from real-time listener responses, rather than retrospective annotation. Our approach substantially outperforms prompt-based and fine-tuned text-only baselines, providing empirical support for the view that evolving semantic constraints inform perceived turn-taking opportunities in unscripted interaction.

cs.CL↗