Point-Cloud-Based Aerial Fragmentation Analysis for Application in the Minerals Industry

Thomas Bamford; Kamran Esmaeili; Angela P. Schoellig

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1703.01945

Point-Cloud-Based Aerial Fragmentation Analysis for Application in the Minerals Industry

Thomas Bamford·Kamran Esmaeili·Angela P. Schoellig

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This work investigates the application of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) technology for measurement of rock fragmentation without placement of scale objects in the scene to determine image scale. Commonly practiced image-based rock fragmentation analysis requires a technician to walk to a rock pile, place a scale object of known size in the area of interest, and capture individual 2D images. Our previous work has used UAV technology for the first time to acquire real-time rock fragmentation data and has shown comparable quality of results; however, it still required the (potentially dangerous) placement of scale objects, and continued to make the assumption that the rock pile surface is planar and that the scale objects lie on the surface plane. This work improves our UAV-based approach to enable rock fragmentation measurement without placement of scale objects and without the assumption of planarity. This is achieved by first generating a point cloud of the rock pile from 2D images, taking into account intrinsic and extrinsic camera parameters, and then taking 2D images for fragmentation analysis. This work represents an important step towards automating post-blast rock fragmentation analysis. In experiments, a rock pile with known size distribution was photographed by the UAV with and without using scale objects. For fragmentation analysis without scale objects, a point cloud of the rock pile was generated and used to compute image scale. Comparison of the rock size distributions show that this point-cloud-based method enables producing measurements with better or comparable accuracy (within 10% of the ground truth) to the manual method with scale objects.

Explore related subjects

cs.RO

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Thomas Bamford, Kamran Esmaeili, Angela P. Schoellig. 2017-03-06. Point-Cloud-Based Aerial Fragmentation Analysis for Application in the Minerals Industry. https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.01945

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO↗