arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1702.02110

The 16-vertex model and its even and odd 8-vertex subcases on the square lattice

Michael Assis
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We survey and enlarge the known mappings of the 16-vertex model, with emphasis on mappings between the even and odd 8-vertex subcases of the general model, also giving new mappings between these models, valid on finite toroidal lattices. In particular, we find new mappings between the models by using their algebraic invariants with respect to the $SL(2)\times SL(2)$ symmetry of the 16-vertex model; we also find a larger set of weak-graph transformations. We show many examples of models with negative weights which map to models with only positive weights. Using the algebraic invariant relations of the even and odd 8-vertex models, we find the complete set of points in the complex field plane of the square lattice Ising model in a field which map to the even or odd 8-vertex models; these points also correspond to the set of free-fermionic points of the model. We do not find any new integrable points, but we find a new mapping between the odd 8-vertex model and the square lattice Ising model at magnetic field $H= i\pi/(2\beta)$, valid on finite toroidal lattices. We also show directly through various examples that mappings via algebraic invariants do not fully exhaust the possible mappings a model may have with another model. We construct a new solution to the odd 8-vertex free-fermion model which is valid on the finite lattice, since the previous known solution resulted from a mapping valid only in the thermodynamic limit. Finally, we detail for the first time the phase transitions of the column staggered free-fermion 8-vertex model, and show that it can be mapped to the bi-partite staggered free-fermion model.

Explore related subjects

math-phcond-mat.stat-mechmath.MP

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Michael Assis. 2017-02-07. The 16-vertex model and its even and odd 8-vertex subcases on the square lattice. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aa842c

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why we should condition denoising diffusion generative models on windows of past observations

Data assimilation (DA) is, traditionally, a cycling process that relies on time-dependent priors to propagate information from past observations to future cycles. Using denoising diffusion generative modeling for DA is challenging because standard approaches use a fixed training data set, which in turn leads to a static prior that ignores information from past observations. Because past observations are ignored, DA systems with static priors lead to larger posterior errors than cycling DA systems. Incorporating time-dependent priors into generative models, however, requires expensive and frequent retraining. Motivated by linear systems theory - where the dependence of a prediction of a Kalman filter on past observations decays exponentially - we condition diffusion models on short windows of past observations. Specifically, we describe training procedures for two frameworks: a diffusion DA system predicting the current state given a set of past observations, and a diffusion ``direct observation prediction'' (DOP) system, predicting future observations given a set of past observations. Using a canonical linear system, we show that both systems can achieve the minimal posterior error characteristic of a fully-cycled DA/DOP system, without re-training, provided the time windows are long enough. The linear setup ensures analytical tractability, avoids confounding neural network training errors, and confirms that conditioning on windows of past observations is required for efficient and accurate diffusion-based DA or DOP.

math-ph↗
arXiv2026

The kinematic structures and the inertial geometry of a moving charge

We ask how much of the geometry a charged particle moves in is fixed by its motion, and how much a particle must bring. We ask of a symplectic structure only that it relate velocity to momentum as Hamilton's equations do, and we ask it of every energy at once. In particular, we show that the structures meeting that demand are the canonical one and its twists by a closed two-form of the base. A field provides the two-form, a particle the multiplier before it, which we identify constitutively with its charge. Thus, a single energy governs a family of structures, and each particle takes the one its charge fixes. We then ask what a particle must bring to be given a momentum, and we show that the degree of that map settles the degree at which a field enters Newton's Second Law. An antisymmetric bilinear form returns no Lorentz force, whilst a Randers metric returns one --- a length whose difference from a Riemannian one is linear in the velocity. Moreover, we find that metric already within the twisted structure, as its primitive over a level of the free energy, and its law of transport to be nonlinear, no affine connection being known to serve. Under an indefinite signature the length parts from the dynamics, and the extremals turn from shortest to longest. On the round sphere a monopole flux leaves no such metric, whilst the transport remains and prequantisation, given a unit of action, restricts the charge to a lattice. In this manner, we conclude that each charge-to-mass ratio receives a geometry of its own, so that by a functionalist criterion none of them is the spacetime of a charged particle.

math-ph↗