arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1609.07690

Warp Bridge Sampling: The Next Generation

Abstract

Bridge sampling is an effective Monte Carlo method for estimating the ratio of normalizing constants of two probability densities, a routine computational problem in statistics, physics, chemistry, and other fields. The Monte Carlo error of the bridge sampling estimator is determined by the amount of overlap between the two densities. In the case of uni-modal densities, Warp-I, II, and III transformations (Meng and Schilling, 2002) are effective for increasing the initial overlap, but they are less so for multi-modal densities. This paper introduces Warp-U transformations that aim to transform multi-modal densities into Uni-modal ones without altering their normalizing constants. The construction of a Warp-U transformation starts with a Normal (or other convenient) mixture distribution $\phi_{\text{mix}}$ that has reasonable overlap with the target density $p$, whose normalizing constant is unknown. The stochastic transformation that maps $\phi_{\text{mix}}$ back to its generating distribution $N(0,1)$ is then applied to $p$ yielding its Warp-U version, which we denote $\tilde{p}$. Typically, $\tilde{p}$ is uni-modal and has substantially increased overlap with $N(0,1)$. Furthermore, we prove that the overlap between $\tilde{p}$ and $N(0,1)$ is guaranteed to be no less than the overlap between $p$ and $\phi_{\text{mix}}$, in terms of any $f$-divergence. We propose a computationally efficient method to find an appropriate $\phi_{\text{mix}}$, and a simple but effective approach to remove the bias which results from estimating the normalizing constants and fitting $\phi_{\text{mix}}$ with the same data. We illustrate our findings using 10 and 50 dimensional highly irregular multi-modal densities, and demonstrate how Warp-U sampling can be used to improve the final estimation step of the Generalized Wang-Landau algorithm (Liang, 2005), a powerful sampling and estimation method.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Lazhi Wang, David E. Jones, Xiao-Li Meng. 2016-09-25. Warp Bridge Sampling: The Next Generation. https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.07690

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME