arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1609.00481

Linear Game Theory : Reduction of complexity by decomposing large games into partial games

Abstract

With increasing game size, a problem of computational complexity arises. This is especially true in real world problems such as in social systems, where there is a significant population of players involved in the game, and the complexity problem is critical. Previous studies in algorithmic game theory propose succinct games that enable small descriptions of payoff matrices and reduction of complexities. However, some of the suggested compromises lose generality with strict assumptions such as symmetries in utility functions and cannot be applied to the full range of real world problems that may be presented. Graphical games are relatively promising, with a good balance between complexity and generality. However, they assume a given graph structure of players' interactions and cannot be applied to games without such known graphs. This study proposes a method to identify an interaction graph between players and subsequently decompose games into smaller components by cutting out weak interactions for the purpose of reducing complexity. At the beginning, players' mutual dependencies on their utilities are quantified as variance-covariance matrices among players. Then, the interaction graphs among players are identified by solving eigenvalue problems. Players' interactions are further decomposed into linear combinations of games. This helps to find a consistent equilibrium, which is a Nash equilibrium specified by the decomposition, with reduced computational complexity. Finally, experiments on simple example games are shown to verify the proposed method.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Tatsuya Iwase, Takahiro Shiga. 2016-09-02. Linear Game Theory : Reduction of complexity by decomposing large games into partial games. https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.00481

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT