arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1606.08083

Matrix Balancing in Lp Norms: A New Analysis of Osborne's Iteration

Abstract

We study an iterative matrix conditioning algorithm due to Osborne (1960). The goal of the algorithm is to convert a square matrix into a balanced matrix where every row and corresponding column have the same norm. The original algorithm was proposed for balancing rows and columns in the $L_2$ norm, and it works by iterating over balancing a row-column pair in fixed round-robin order. Variants of the algorithm for other norms have been heavily studied and are implemented as standard preconditioners in many numerical linear algebra packages. Recently, Schulman and Sinclair (2015), in a first result of its kind for any norm, analyzed the rate of convergence of a variant of Osborne's algorithm that uses the $L_{\infty}$ norm and a different order of choosing row-column pairs. In this paper we study matrix balancing in the $L_1$ norm and other $L_p$ norms. We show the following results for any matrix $A = (a_{ij})_{i,j=1}^n$, resolving in particular a main open problem mentioned by Schulman and Sinclair. 1) We analyze the iteration for the $L_1$ norm under a greedy order of balancing. We show that it converges to an $\epsilon$-balanced matrix in $K = O(\min\{\epsilon^{-2}\log w,\epsilon^{-1}n^{3/2}\log(w/\epsilon)\})$ iterations that cost a total of $O(m + Kn\log n)$ arithmetic operations over $O(n\log w)$-bit numbers. Here $m$ is the number of non-zero entries of $A$, and $w = \sum_{i,j} |a_{ij}|/a_{\min}$ with $a_{\min} = \min\{|a_{ij}|:\ a_{ij}\neq 0\}$. 2) We show that the original round-robin implementation converges to an $\epsilon$-balanced matrix in $O(\epsilon^{-2}n^2\log w)$ iterations totalling $O(\epsilon^{-2}mn\log w)$ arithmetic operations over $O(n\log w)$-bit numbers. 3) We demonstrate a lower bound of $\Omega(1/\sqrt{\epsilon})$ on the convergence rate of any implementation of the iteration.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Rafail Ostrovsky, Yuval Rabani, Arman Yousefi. 2016-06-26. Matrix Balancing in Lp Norms: A New Analysis of Osborne's Iteration. https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.08083

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS