Two-stage algorithms for covering array construction

Kaushik Sarkar; Charles J. Colbourn

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1606.06730

Two-stage algorithms for covering array construction

Kaushik Sarkar·Charles J. Colbourn

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Modern software systems often consist of many different components, each with a number of options. Although unit tests may reveal faulty options for individual components, functionally correct components may interact in unforeseen ways to cause a fault. Covering arrays are used to test for interactions among components systematically. A two-stage framework, providing a number of concrete algorithms, is developed for the efficient construction of covering arrays. %Our framework divides the construction in two stages. In the first stage, a time and memory efficient randomized algorithm covers most of the interactions. In the second stage, a more sophisticated search covers the remainder in relatively few tests. In this way, the storage limitations of the sophisticated search algorithms are avoided; hence the range of the number of components for which the algorithm can be applied is extended, without increasing the number of tests. Many of the framework instantiations can be tuned to optimize a memory-quality trade-off, so that fewer tests can be achieved using more memory. The algorithms developed outperform the currently best known methods when the number of components ranges from 20 to 60, the number of options for each ranges from 3 to 6, and $t$-way interactions are covered for $t\in \{5,6\}$. In some cases a reduction in the number of tests by more than $50\%$ is achieved.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.DM cs.SE math.CO

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Kaushik Sarkar, Charles J. Colbourn. 2016-06-21. Two-stage algorithms for covering array construction. https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.06730

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗