arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1606.05732

How to Fake Multiply by a Gaussian Matrix

Abstract

Have you ever wanted to multiply an $n \times d$ matrix $X$, with $n \gg d$, on the left by an $m \times n$ matrix $\tilde G$ of i.i.d. Gaussian random variables, but could not afford to do it because it was too slow? In this work we propose a new randomized $m \times n$ matrix $T$, for which one can compute $T \cdot X$ in only $O(\text{nnz}(X)) + \tilde O(m^2 \cdot d^{3})$ time, for which the total variation distance between the distributions $T \cdot X$ and $\tilde G \cdot X$ is as small as desired, i.e., less than any positive constant. Here $\text{nnz}(X)$ denotes the number of non-zero entries of $X$. Assuming $\text{nnz}(X) \gg m^2 \cdot d^{3}$, this is a significant savings over the na\"ive $O(\text{nnz}(X) m)$ time to compute $\tilde G \cdot X$. Moreover, since the total variation distance is small, we can provably use $T \cdot X$ in place of $\tilde G \cdot X$ in any application and have the same guarantees as if we were using $\tilde G \cdot X$, up to a small positive constant in error probability. We apply this transform to nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) and support vector machines (SVM).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Michael Kapralov, Vamsi K. Potluru, David P. Woodruff. 2016-06-18. How to Fake Multiply by a Gaussian Matrix. https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.05732

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS