arXiv · 1605.09171
Randomization and The Pernicious Effects of Limited Budgets on Auction Experiments
Abstract
Buyers (e.g., advertisers) often have limited financial and processing resources, and so their participation in auctions is throttled. Changes to auctions may affect bids or throttling and any change may affect what winners pay. This paper shows that if an A/B experiment affects only bids, then the observed treatment effect is unbiased when all the bidders in an auction are randomly assigned to A or B but it can be severely biased otherwise, even in the absence of throttling. Experiments that affect throttling algorithms can also be badly biased, but the bias can be substantially reduced if the budget for each advertiser in the experiment is allocated to separate pots for the A and B arms of the experiment.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Guillaume W. Basse, Hossein Azari Soufiani, Diane Lambert. 2016-05-30. Randomization and The Pernicious Effects of Limited Budgets on Auction Experiments. https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.09171
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.