arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1605.07107

Revenue Maximization in Service Systems with Heterogeneous Customers

Abstract

In this paper, we consider revenue maximization problem for a two server system in the presence of heterogeneous customers. We assume that the customers differ in their cost for unit delay and this is modeled as a continuous random variable with a distribution $F.$ We also assume that each server charges an admission price to each customer that decide to join its queue. We first consider the monopoly problem where both the servers belong to a single operator. The heterogeneity of the customer makes the analysis of the problem difficult. The difficulty lies in the inability to characterize the equilibrium queue arrival rates as a function of the admission prices. We provide an equivalent formulation with the queue arrival rates as the optimization variable simplifying the analysis for revenue rate maximization for the monopoly. We then consider the duopoly problem where each server competes with the other server to maximize its revenue rate. For the duopoly problem, the interest is to obtain the set of admission prices satisfying the Nash equilibrium conditions. While the problem is in general difficult to analyze, we consider the special case when the two servers are identical. For such a duopoly system, we obtain the necessary condition for existence of symmetric Nash equilibrium of the admission prices. The knowledge of the distribution $F$ characterizing the heterogeneity of the customers is necessary to solve the monopoly and the duopoly problem. However, for most practical scenarios, the functional form of $F$ may not be known to the system operator and in such cases, the revenue maximizing prices cannot be determined. In the last part of the paper, we provide a simple method to estimate the distribution $F$ by suitably varying the admission prices. We illustrate the method with some numerical examples.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Tejas Bodas, D. Manjunath. 2016-05-23. Revenue Maximization in Service Systems with Heterogeneous Customers. https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.07107

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT