arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1604.07871

Cosmology from large scale galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing with Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data

Juliana Kwan·Carles Sanchez·Joseph Clampitt·Jonathan Blazek·Martin Crocce·Bhuvnesh Jain·Joe Zuntz·Adam Amara·Matthew Becker·Gary Bernstein·Christopher Bonnett·Joseph DeRose·Scott Dodelson·Tim Eifler·Enrique Gaztanaga·Tommaso Giannantonio·Daniel Gruen·Will Hartley·Tomasz Kacprzak·Donnacha Kirk·Elisabeth Krause·Niall MacCrann·Ramon Miquel·Youngsoo Park·Ashley Ross·Eduardo Rozo·Eli Rykoff·Erin Sheldon·Michael A. Troxel·Risa Wechsler·Tim Abbott·Filipe Abdalla·Sahar Allam·Aurélien Benoit-Lévy·David Brooks·David Burke·Aurelio Carnero Rosell·Matias Carrasco Kind·Carlos Cunha·Chris D'Andrea·Luiz da Costa·Shantanu Desai·H. Thomas Diehl·Jörg Dietrich·Peter Doel·August Evrard·Enrique Fernandez·David Finley·Brenna Flaugher·Pablo Fosalba·Josh Frieman·David Gerdes·Robert Gruendl·Gaston Gutierrez·Klaus Honscheid·David James·Mike Jarvis·Kyler Kuehn·Ofer Lahav·Marcos Lima·Marcio Maia·Jennifer Marshall·Paul Martini·Peter Melchior·Joe Mohr·Robert Nichol·Brian Nord·Andres Plazas·Kevin Reil·Kathy Romer·Aaron Roodman·Eusebio Sanchez·Vic Scarpine·Ignacio Sevilla·R. Chris Smith·Marcelle Soares-Santos·Flavia Sobreira·Eric Suchyta·Molly Swanson·Gregory Tarle·Daniel Thomas·Vinu Vikram·Alistair Walker
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We present cosmological constraints from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) using a combined analysis of angular clustering of red galaxies and their cross-correlation with weak gravitational lensing of background galaxies. We use a 139 square degree contiguous patch of DES data from the Science Verification (SV) period of observations. Using large scale measurements, we constrain the matter density of the Universe as Omega_m = 0.31 +/- 0.09 and the clustering amplitude of the matter power spectrum as sigma_8 = 0.74 +/- 0.13 after marginalizing over seven nuisance parameters and three additional cosmological parameters. This translates into S_8 = sigma_8(Omega_m/0.3)^{0.16} = 0.74 +/- 0.12 for our fiducial lens redshift bin at 0.35 <z< 0.5, while S_8 = 0.78 +/- 0.09 using two bins over the range 0.2 <z< 0.5. We study the robustness of the results under changes in the data vectors, modelling and systematics treatment, including photometric redshift and shear calibration uncertainties, and find consistency in the derived cosmological parameters. We show that our results are consistent with previous cosmological analyses from DES and other data sets and conclude with a joint analysis of DES angular clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing with Planck CMB data, Baryon Accoustic Oscillations and Supernova type Ia measurements.

Explore related subjects

astro-ph.CO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Juliana Kwan, Carles Sanchez, Joseph Clampitt, Jonathan Blazek, Martin Crocce, Bhuvnesh Jain, Joe Zuntz, Adam Amara, Matthew Becker, Gary Bernstein, Christopher Bonnett, Joseph DeRose, Scott Dodelson, Tim Eifler, Enrique Gaztanaga, Tommaso Giannantonio, Daniel Gruen, Will Hartley, Tomasz Kacprzak, Donnacha Kirk, Elisabeth Krause, Niall MacCrann, Ramon Miquel, Youngsoo Park, Ashley Ross, Eduardo Rozo, Eli Rykoff, Erin Sheldon, Michael A. Troxel, Risa Wechsler, Tim Abbott, Filipe Abdalla, Sahar Allam, Aurélien Benoit-Lévy, David Brooks, David Burke, Aurelio Carnero Rosell, Matias Carrasco Kind, Carlos Cunha, Chris D'Andrea, Luiz da Costa, Shantanu Desai, H. Thomas Diehl, Jörg Dietrich, Peter Doel, August Evrard, Enrique Fernandez, David Finley, Brenna Flaugher, Pablo Fosalba, Josh Frieman, David Gerdes, Robert Gruendl, Gaston Gutierrez, Klaus Honscheid, David James, Mike Jarvis, Kyler Kuehn, Ofer Lahav, Marcos Lima, Marcio Maia, Jennifer Marshall, Paul Martini, Peter Melchior, Joe Mohr, Robert Nichol, Brian Nord, Andres Plazas, Kevin Reil, Kathy Romer, Aaron Roodman, Eusebio Sanchez, Vic Scarpine, Ignacio Sevilla, R. Chris Smith, Marcelle Soares-Santos, Flavia Sobreira, Eric Suchyta, Molly Swanson, Gregory Tarle, Daniel Thomas, Vinu Vikram, Alistair Walker. 2016-04-26. Cosmology from large scale galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing with Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras%2Fstw2464

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Constraining spinning primordial black holes with interstellar dust heating

Primordial black holes (PBHs) are a well-motivated dark matter candidate, and their cosmic abundance is constrained by a variety of observational probes. PBHs in the mass range $10^{15}\,\text{g}\,{-}\,10^{17}\,\text{g}$ are evaporating today via Hawking radiation, a process that can heat interstellar dust and modify its thermal emission. Recent studies have used this effect to place constraints on the abundance of non-spinning PBHs. We extend this approach by investigating the influence of PBH spin on dust-heating constraints. Furthermore, we account for secondary photons that originate not only from the decay of gauge bosons but also from the decay of hadrons produced via the fragmentation of primary quarks and gluons emitted through Hawking radiation. By comparing the dust heating rate induced by spinning PBHs with the maximum cooling rate of dust, considering both silicate and graphite grains, we derive new upper limits on the fraction of dark matter in the form of PBHs, $f_{\rm PBH}$. Our results show that the constraints depend on both PBH mass and spin. Smaller PBHs with higher spin yield stronger limits. For example, in the cases we investigated, the strongest constraint is $f_{\rm PBH} \sim 1.5 \times 10^{-4}$ for $M_{\rm PBH} = 10^{15}{\rm g}$ and spin parameter $a_{*} = 0.9999$. Although these limits are less stringent than existing constraints in the same mass range, they provide a distinct and complementary approach to constraining the abundance of PBHs.

astro-ph.CO↗
arXiv2026

Two-parameter continuous deformation of Starobinsky inflation as a bridge between Planck and ACT DESI data with $N_\star\in(50,60)$

We present a family of plateau-type inflationary potentials, eq.~\eqref{Vgeneral}, and analyze a two-parameter $\alpha\beta$-Starobinsky specialization that interpolates continuously between a \emph{maximal} plateau ($V\!\to\!V_0$) and a \emph{submaximal} plateau ($V\!\to\!V_\infty 0$ with $x_\star\gg 1/\beta$ the slow-roll scaling laws change to $n_s\simeq 1-\frac{4}{3N_\star},\, r\simeq\mathcal{C}(\alpha,\beta)\,N_\star^{-4/3},$ with an explicit coefficient $\mathcal{C}(\alpha,\beta)$ set by the plateau truncation. This deformation lifts $n_s$ at fixed $N_\star$ while further suppressing $r$, reconciling the Planck~2018 constraint $n_s=0.9649\pm0.0042$ (68\% CL) and BICEP/Keck18 data $r_{0.05}<0.036$ (95\% CL), with the higher central values $n_s\sim0.97$--$0.98$ preferred by ACT+DESI~DR2 (BAO), within the theoretically motivated interval $N_\star\in(50,60)$ and without exotic reheating. We provide an exact identity for $V/V'$ enabling analytic control of $N_\star$, a practical crossover criterion $\beta\,x_\star\ll1$ vs.\ $\gg1$, and a transparent mapping between $(\alpha,\beta)$ and the observables $(n_s,r,N_\star)$. These yield sharp, testable signatures, particularly the softened $N_\star$-scaling of $r$, that distinguish a maximal from a submaximal plateau with upcoming CMB and LSS data.

astro-ph.CO↗
arXiv2026

A Tale of Two Gauges: Effective Field Theory for Relativistic Behavior of Cosmological Axions

In this work, we present a formalism to model the relativistic behavior of axions. The relativistic behavior of axions is surprisingly difficult to model precisely, as it involves oscillations on timescales much shorter than the Hubble timescale. To overcome this challenge, one typically resorts to some form of effective treatment, focusing only on the time-averaged description of the exact oscillations. Salehian, Namjoo & Kaiser provide a systematic framework for such treatment, based on the effective field theory formalism. While the aforementioned study was formulated for axion perturbations in the Newtonian gauge with no anisotropic stress, we extend the formalism to the synchronous gauge that is more conventionally used for numerical implementation in a realistic cosmological setting. Unlike their work, however, we propose a fluid interpretation in which the axion field can be identified as a perfect fluid at all times, both in the exact and effective regimes. Moreover, we present the effective field theory for the Newtonian gauge with non-zero anisotropic stress, making the original formulation more general and useful for scenarios where the matter content of the universe is multi-component. These results lay the theoretical foundation for a companion paper where we discuss how the axion field should be incorporated alongside other species in common cosmological Boltzmann solvers.

astro-ph.CO↗