JI-distributive, dually quasi-De Morgan semi-Heyting and Heyting algebras

Hanamantagouda P. Sankappanavar

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1512.05441

JI-distributive, dually quasi-De Morgan semi-Heyting and Heyting algebras

Hanamantagouda P. Sankappanavar

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The variety DQD of semi-Heyting algebras with a weak negation, called dually quasi-De Morgan operation, and several of its subvarieties were investigated in a series of four papers. In this paper we define and investigate a new subvariety JID of DQD, called JI-distributive, dually quasi-De Morgan semi-Heyting algebras, as well as the variety DSt of dually Stone semi-Heyting algebras. We first prove that DSt and JID are discriminator varieties of level 1 and level 2, respectively. Secondly, we give a characterization of subdirectly irreducible algebras of the subvariety JID1 of level 1 of JID. As a first application of it, we derive that the variety JID1 is the join of the variety DSt and the variety of De Morgan Boolean semi-Heyting algebras. As a second application, we give a concrete description of the subdirectly irreducible algebras in the subvariety JIDL1 of JID1 defined by the linear identity, and deduce that the variety JIDL1 is the join of the variety DStHC generated by the dually Stone Heyting chains and the variety generated by the 4-element De Morgan Boolean Heyting algebra. Several applications of this result are also given, including a description of the lattice of subvarieties of JIDL1, equational bases of all subvarieties of JIDL1, and the amalgamation property of all subvarieties of DStHC.

Explore related subjects

math.LO

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Hanamantagouda P. Sankappanavar. 2015-12-17. JI-distributive, dually quasi-De Morgan semi-Heyting and Heyting algebras. https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.05441

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO↗

arXiv2026

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO↗

arXiv2026

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO↗