arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1512.05028

Optimal Las Vegas reduction from one-way set reconciliation to error correction

Abstract

Suppose we have two players $A$ and $C$, where player $A$ has a string $s[0..u-1]$ and player $C$ has a string $t[0..u-1]$ and none of the two players knows the other's string. Assume that $s$ and $t$ are both over an integer alphabet $[σ]$, where the first string contains $n$ non-zero entries. We would wish to answer to the following basic question. Assuming that $s$ and $t$ differ in at most $k$ positions, how many bits does player $A$ need to send to player $C$ so that he can recover $s$ with certainty? Further, how much time does player $A$ need to spend to compute the sent bits and how much time does player $C$ need to recover the string $s$? This problem has a certain number of applications, for example in databases, where each of the two parties possesses a set of $n$ key-value pairs, where keys are from the universe $[u]$ and values are from $[σ]$ and usually $n\ll u$. In this paper, we show a time and message-size optimal Las Vegas reduction from this problem to the problem of systematic error correction of $k$ errors for strings of length $Θ(n)$ over an alphabet of size $2^{Θ(\logσ+\log (u/n))}$. The additional running time incurred by the reduction is linear randomized for player $A$ and linear deterministic for player $B$, but the correction works with certainty. When using the popular Reed-Solomon codes, the reduction gives a protocol that transmits $O(k(\log u+\logσ))$ bits and runs in time $O(n\cdot\mathrm{polylog}(n)(\log u+\logσ))$ for all values of $k$. The time is randomized for player $A$ (encoding time) and deterministic for player $C$ (decoding time). The space is optimal whenever $k\leq (uσ)^{1-Ω(1)}$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Djamal Belazzougui. 2015-12-16. Optimal Las Vegas reduction from one-way set reconciliation to error correction. https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.05028

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS