Instability and Information

Felix Patzelt

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1511.03732

Instability and Information

Felix Patzelt

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Many complex systems exhibit extreme events far more often than expected for a normal distribution. This work examines how self-similar bursts of activity across several orders of magnitude can emerge from first principles in systems that adapt to information. Surprising connections are found between two apparently unrelated research topics: hand-eye coordination in balancing tasks and speculative trading in financial markets. Seemingly paradoxically, locally minimising fluctuations can increase a dynamical system's sensitivity to unpredictable perturbations and thereby facilitate global catastrophes. This general principle is studied in several domain-specific models and in behavioural experiments. It explains many findings in both fields and resolves an apparent antinomy: the coexistence of stabilising control or market efficiency and perpetual instabilities resembling critical phenomena in physical systems.

Explore related subjects

physics.soc-ph nlin.AO q-fin.GN

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Felix Patzelt. 2015-11-11. Instability and Information. https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.03732

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Universality and Heterogeneity of Stylized Facts in Cryptocurrency and Equity Markets

This study investigates whether the macroscopic statistical maturity of cryptocurrencies implies dynamical equivalence with an equity-market benchmark. We analyze one-minute data (2020--2025) for Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, and E-mini S\&P~500 futures using the Complexity--Entropy Causality Plane (CECP) and directed horizontal visibility graphs (DHVG). While conventional stylized facts overlap across the analyzed assets, cryptocurrencies exhibit weaker local ordinal organization and a larger divergence between their high-degree in- and out-visibility distributions relative to matched surrogate baselines under the primary specification. This high-degree separation is strongest at the one-minute scale and weakens under 5- and 10-minute aggregation, while the direction of the underlying asymmetry remains more asset- and preprocessing-dependent. We therefore conclude only that macroscopic similarity can coexist with diagnostic-specific structural differences in the assets and period examined.

physics.soc-ph↗

arXiv2026

Geography as the Organizing Grammar of Geospatial Models

GeoAI increasingly produces reusable Earth representation s, physical forecasts, multimodal systems, and reasoning a gents. Their progress exposes two distinct limitations. Geo graphic completeness asks whether the represented world ex tends beyond readily observed land surfaces and atmospher ic fields to oceans, biogeography, economies, institutions, and human agency. Geographic intelligence asks whether model outputs preserve place, scale, relations, process, un certainty, and the limits of valid inference. The first con cerns what exists in a model; the second concerns what may responsibly be claimed about it. This critical integrative review argues that geography provides the organizing gram mar that connects these dimensions. Seven structural gaps, propositions, and corresponding review questions translate the argument into testable requirements. The resulting re search agenda advances Living Geospatial Models as federat ed, continually updated systems that couple specialist Earth and human-domain models through shared geographic iden tity, support, relations, provenance, and uncertainty. The objective is not a single universal network, but geospatial intelligence that can explain connections and change, antic ipate plausible futures, and support accountable decisions across places and scales.

physics.soc-ph↗

arXiv2026

When higher-order interactions matter: reducibility, parsimony, and microscopic organization

The current debate on higher-order interactions raises a fundamental question: when can systems organized through group interactions be faithfully represented within a graph-based formalism? Recent results show that graph descriptions can reproduce higher-order dynamics exactly or preserve selected macroscopic observables. Yet reducibility does not necessarily imply simplification, as information removed from the interaction structure may reappear as complexity in the effective dynamics, while structural features such as nestedness, heterogeneity, and cross-order correlations may be obscured by the reduction. We argue that formal representability alone is insufficient as a criterion for model choice. Both "simpler" and "equivalent" are question-dependent notions: parsimony must be assessed for the complete structure-dynamics model, and adequacy must be defined relative to the observables, scales, and regimes required by the scientific question. A reduced model may therefore be fully adequate for locating a phase transition or identifying a universality class while being inadequate for reproducing microscopic trajectories, transient dynamics, or structure-function relations. When group structure carries relevant microscopic information, higher-order representations may remain the most direct, interpretable, and parsimonious description, as well as the natural framework for understanding how microscopic organization gives rise to macroscopic behavior and functionality.

physics.soc-ph↗