arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1510.03895

A faster subquadratic algorithm for finding outlier correlations

Abstract

We study the problem of detecting outlier pairs of strongly correlated variables among a collection of $n$ variables with otherwise weak pairwise correlations. After normalization, this task amounts to the geometric task where we are given as input a set of $n$ vectors with unit Euclidean norm and dimension $d$, and for some constants $0<τ<ρ<1$, we are asked to find all the outlier pairs of vectors whose inner product is at least $ρ$ in absolute value, subject to the promise that all but at most $q$ pairs of vectors have inner product at most $τ$ in absolute value. Improving on an algorithm of G. Valiant [FOCS 2012; J. ACM 2015], we present a randomized algorithm that for Boolean inputs ($\{-1,1\}$-valued data normalized to unit Euclidean length) runs in time \[ \tilde O\bigl(n^{\max\,\{1-γ+M(Δγ,γ),\,M(1-γ,2Δγ)\}}+qdn^{2γ}\bigr)\,, \] where $0<γ<1$ is a constant tradeoff parameter and $M(μ,ν)$ is the exponent to multiply an $\lfloor n^μ\rfloor\times\lfloor n^ν\rfloor$ matrix with an $\lfloor n^ν\rfloor\times \lfloor n^μ\rfloor$ matrix and $Δ=1/(1-\log_τρ)$. As corollaries we obtain randomized algorithms that run in time \[ \tilde O\bigl(n^{\frac{2ω}{3-\log_τρ}}+qdn^{\frac{2(1-\log_τρ)}{3-\log_τρ}}\bigr) \] and in time \[ \tilde O\bigl(n^{\frac{4}{2+α(1-\log_τρ)}}+qdn^{\frac{2α(1-\log_τρ)}{2+α(1-\log_τρ)}}\bigr)\,, \] where $2\leqω<2.38$ is the exponent for square matrix multiplication and $0.3<α\leq 1$ is the exponent for rectangular matrix multiplication. The notation $\tilde O(\cdot)$ hides polylogarithmic factors in $n$ and $d$ whose degree may depend on $ρ$ and $τ$. We present further corollaries for the light bulb problem and for learning sparse Boolean functions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Matti Karppa, Petteri Kaski, Jukka Kohonen. 2018-01-04. A faster subquadratic algorithm for finding outlier correlations. https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.03895

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Online Flexible Busy Time Scheduling on Heterogeneous Machines

We study the online busy time scheduling model on heterogeneous machines. In our setting, jobs with uniform processing time arrive online with a deadline that becomes known to the algorithm at the job's arrival time. An algorithm has access to machines, each with different associated capacities and costs. The goal is to schedule jobs on machines by their deadline, so that the total cost incurred by the scheduling algorithm is minimized. While busy time scheduling has been well-studied, relatively little is known when machines are heterogeneous (i.e., have different costs and capacities), despite this natural theoretical generalization being the most practical model for clients using cloud computing services. We make significant progress in understanding this model by designing a deterministic online algorithm with competitive ratio 8(2p-1)/p < 16 when all jobs have uniform processing time p. A randomized version of this algorithm is 4(2p-1)/(p \ln 2)-competitive against an oblivious adversary. For unit-processing-time jobs, we give lower bounds of 4 and e (where e is Euler's number) on the competitive ratio of deterministic and randomized online algorithms, respectively. For unit-processing-time jobs with agreeable deadlines, we provide a deterministic 2-competitive online algorithm and a matching lower bound.

cs.DS

The Binary Tree Mechanism is Optimal for Differentially Private Continual Counting

Private continual counting is a fundamental problem in differential privacy: given a binary stream of length $n$, where each $1$ corresponds to the contribution of one individual, the goal is to release all running counts while protecting the privacy of each individual. For fixed privacy parameters, the standard binary tree mechanism achieves expected $\ell_\infty$ error $O(\log^{3/2} n)$ under approximate differential privacy and $O(\log^2 n)$ under pure differential privacy. Whether these dependences on the stream length are necessary has remained a central open problem. For fixed $\varepsilon\in(0,1)$, we prove a lower bound of $Ω(\log^{3/2} n)$ under approximate DP with sufficiently small fixed $δ>0$, and a lower bound of $Ω(\log^2 n)$ under pure DP. These bounds establish the optimality of the binary tree mechanism in both settings. The bounds hold for arbitrary mechanisms, even when the entire stream is available in advance. Both proofs use the same decomposition and accumulation of residual noise along a tree. As a consequence of the approximate-DP bound, we also obtain a largest-possible separation between hereditary discrepancy and private $\ell_\infty$ error for linear queries, showing that the known general upper bound in terms of hereditary discrepancy has the optimal dependence on the number of queries.

cs.DS

Directed Hamiltonian-Cycle Parity in $O^*((3/2)^n)$ Deterministic Time and Polynomial Space

We give a deterministic algorithm that computes the parity of the number of Hamiltonian cycles in an $n$-vertex directed graph in $O(n^4(3/2)^n)$ time and $O(n^2)$ bits of working space, improving the $O^*(φ^n)$ bound of Björklund and Husfeldt. Their local-degree formula reduces the problem to a weighted sum over solutions of structured quadratic equations. We cover the corresponding ternary state space by binary subcubes, each inducing an affine system. The Kuang--Wang cover can be regenerated within the target bound; canonical ownership resolves its overlaps, while self-loop conditional expectations bound every affine solution visit. Rollback elimination shares the work across cover prefixes. The same cover gives a Las Vegas algorithm listing all $L$ solutions of $m$ affine product constraints in $N$ Boolean variables in expected time $\operatorname{poly}(N,m)((3/2)^m+L)$ and polynomial space. Finally, we show that complete enumeration can require $Ω((3/2)^n)$ visits even on strongly connected digraphs after an optimal self-loop choice. This is a limitation of the enumeration method, not a general lower bound for Hamiltonian-cycle parity.

cs.DS