arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1510.02451

The Bouncy Particle Sampler: A Non-Reversible Rejection-Free Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method

Abstract

Markov chain Monte Carlo methods have become standard tools in statistics to sample from complex probability measures. Many available techniques rely on discrete-time reversible Markov chains whose transition kernels build up over the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. We explore and propose several original extensions of an alternative approach introduced recently in Peters and de With (2012) where the target distribution of interest is explored using a continuous-time Markov process. In the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm, a trial move to a region of lower target density, equivalently "higher energy", than the current state can be rejected with positive probability. In this alternative approach, a particle moves along straight lines continuously around the space and, when facing a high energy barrier, it is not rejected but its path is modified by bouncing against this barrier. The resulting non-reversible Markov process provides a rejection-free MCMC sampling scheme. We propose several original techniques to simulate this continuous-time process exactly in a wide range of scenarios of interest to statisticians. When the target distribution factorizes as a product of factors involving only subsets of variables, such as the posterior distribution associated to a probabilistic graphical model, it is possible to modify the original algorithm to exploit this structure and update in parallel variables within each clique. We present several extensions by proposing methods to sample mixed discrete-continuous distributions and distributions restricted to a connected smooth domain. We also show that it is possible to move the particle using a general flow instead of straight lines. We demonstrate the efficiency of this methodology through simulations on a variety of applications and show that it can outperform Hybrid Monte Carlo schemes in interesting scenarios.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Alexandre Bouchard-Côté, Sebastian J. Vollmer, Arnaud Doucet. 2015-10-08. The Bouncy Particle Sampler: A Non-Reversible Rejection-Free Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method. https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.02451

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME