arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1508.06803

Sequential rank agreement methods for comparison of ranked lists

Claus Thorn Ekstrøm·Thomas Alexander Gerds·Andreas Kryger Jensen·Kasper Brink-Jensen
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The comparison of alternative rankings of a set of items is a general and prominent task in applied statistics. Predictor variables are ranked according to magnitude of association with an outcome, prediction models rank subjects according to the personalized risk of an event, and genetic studies rank genes according to their difference in gene expression levels. This article constructs measures of the agreement of two or more ordered lists. We use the standard deviation of the ranks to define a measure of agreement that both provides an intuitive interpretation and can be applied to any number of lists even if some or all are incomplete or censored. The approach can identify change-points in the agreement of the lists and the sequential changes of agreement as a function of the depth of the lists can be compared graphically to a permutation based reference set. The usefulness of these tools are illustrated using gene rankings, and using data from two Danish ovarian cancer studies where we assess the within and between agreement of different statistical classification methods.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Claus Thorn Ekstrøm, Thomas Alexander Gerds, Andreas Kryger Jensen, Kasper Brink-Jensen. 2015-08-27. Sequential rank agreement methods for comparison of ranked lists. https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.06803

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Generalised Covariances and Correlations

The covariance of two random variables measures the average joint deviations from their respective means. We generalise this well-known measure by replacing the means with other statistical functionals such as quantiles, expectiles, or thresholds. Deviations from these functionals are defined via generalised errors, typically induced through identification or moment functions. As a normalised measure of dependence, a generalised correlation is constructed. Replacing the common Cauchy--Schwarz normalisation by a novel Fréchet--Hoeffding normalisation, we obtain attainability of the entire interval $[-1, 1]$ for any given marginal distributions. We uncover favourable properties of these new dependence measures and establish consistent estimators. The families of quantile and threshold correlations make it possible to measure local dependence and give rise to function-valued distributional correlations, exhibiting the entire dependence structure. Quantile correlations also lead to tail correlations, new measures of tail dependence, closely related to and refining classical coefficients of tail dependence. Finally, we construct summary covariances (correlations), a class of regional or global dependence measures, which arise as (normalised) weighted averages of distributional covariances. We retrieve covariance, Pearson and Spearman correlation as special cases. The usefulness of our new dependence measures is illustrated on demographic data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Compressive Bayesian non-negative matrix factorization for mutational signatures analysis

Non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) is a popular tool for dimensionality reduction, especially for count matrices. However, inferring an appropriate number of factors is challenging. Existing approaches based on information criteria or nonparametric sparsity-inducing priors tend to be computationally burdensome or highly sensitive to prior choices. Moreover, theoretical properties of the posterior distribution of Poisson NMF parameters endowed with shrinkage priors remain under-explored. This paper introduces a novel Bayesian NMF method that automatically infers the number of factors while also incorporating information on the latent factors from previous studies. This is achieved using compressive hyperpriors, which are hierarchical priors that make the sample-specific weights of unneeded factors concentrate near zero in the posterior. We provide novel distribution theory for posterior inference to elucidate this shrinkage mechanism, both in finite samples and asymptotically. We apply our method to mutational signatures analysis in cancer genomics, in simulations and on real data from breast cancer. Compared to state-of-the-art alternatives, our method is more robust to mild overdispersion and improves detection and estimation of signatures aligned with prior information.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

On Relative Cumulative Residual Information Measure and Its Applications

We develop a relative cumulative residual information measure (RCRI) that aims to quantify the divergence between two survival functions. The dynamic relative cumulative residual information (DRCRI) measure is also introduced. We establish some characterization results under the assumption of the proportional hazards model. Additionally, we obtained the non-parametric estimators of RCRI and DRCRI measures based on the kernel density type estimator for the survival function. The effectiveness of the estimators are assessed through an extensive Monte Carlo simulation study. We consider data from the third Gaia data release (Gaia DR3) to demonstrate the use of the proposed measure. For this study, we have collected epoch photometry data for the objects Gaia DR3 4111834567779557376 and Gaia DR3 5090605830056251776. RCRI-based image analysis is conducted using Chest X-ray data from the publicly available dataset.

stat.ME↗