arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1506.06983

Linear Algorithms for Computing the Lyndon Border Array and the Lyndon Suffix Array

Abstract

We consider the problem of finding repetitive structures and inherent patterns in a given string $\s{s}$ of length $n$ over a finite totally ordered alphabet. A border $\s{u}$ of a string $\s{s}$ is both a prefix and a suffix of $\s{s}$ such that $\s{u} \not= \s{s}$. The computation of the border array of a string $\s{s}$, namely the borders of each prefix of $\s{s}$, is strongly related to the string matching problem: given a string $\s{w}$, find all of its occurrences in $\s{s}$. A {\itshape Lyndon word} is a primitive word (i.e., it is not a power of another word) which is minimal for the lexicographical order of its conjugacy class (i.e., the set of words obtained by cyclic rotations of the letters). In this paper we combine these concepts to introduce the \emph{Lyndon Border Array} $\mathcal L \beta$ of $\s{s}$, whose $i$-th entry $\mathcal L \beta(\s{s})[i]$ is the length of the longest border of $\s{s}[1 \dd i]$ which is also a Lyndon word. We propose linear-time and linear-space algorithms for computing $\mathcal L \beta (\s{s})$. %in the case of both binary and bounded alphabets. Further, we introduce the \emph{Lyndon Suffix Array}, and by modifying the efficient suffix array technique of Ko and Aluru \cite{KA03} outline a linear time and space algorithm for its construction.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ali Alatabbi, Jacqueline W. Daykin, M. Sohel Rahman. 2015-06-23. Linear Algorithms for Computing the Lyndon Border Array and the Lyndon Suffix Array. https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.06983

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS