Power, Energy and Speed of Embedded and Server Multi-Cores applied to Distributed Simulation of Spiking Neural Networks: ARM in NVIDIA Tegra vs Intel Xeon quad-cores

Pier Stanislao Paolucci; Roberto Ammendola; Andrea Biagioni; Ottorino Frezza; Francesca Lo Cicero; Alessandro Lonardo; Michele Martinelli; Elena Pastorelli; Francesco Simula; Piero Vicini

arXiv · 1505.03015

Power, Energy and Speed of Embedded and Server Multi-Cores applied to Distributed Simulation of Spiking Neural Networks: ARM in NVIDIA Tegra vs Intel Xeon quad-cores

Pier Stanislao Paolucci·Roberto Ammendola·Andrea Biagioni·Ottorino Frezza·Francesca Lo Cicero·Alessandro Lonardo·Michele Martinelli·Elena Pastorelli·Francesco Simula·Piero Vicini

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This short note regards a comparison of instantaneous power, total energy consumption, execution time and energetic cost per synaptic event of a spiking neural network simulator (DPSNN-STDP) distributed on MPI processes when executed either on an embedded platform (based on a dual socket quad-core ARM platform) or a server platform (INTEL-based quad-core dual socket platform). We also compare the measure with those reported by leading custom and semi-custom designs: TrueNorth and SpiNNaker. In summary, we observed that: 1- we spent 2.2 micro-Joule per simulated event on the "embedded platform", approx. 4.4 times lower than what was spent by the "server platform"; 2- the instantaneous power consumption of the "embedded platform" was 14.4 times better than the "server" one; 3- the server platform is a factor 3.3 faster. The "embedded platform" is made of NVIDIA Jetson TK1 boards, interconnected by Ethernet, each mounting a Tegra K1 chip including a quad-core ARM Cortex-A15 at 2.3GHz. The "server platform" is based on dual-socket quad-core Intel Xeon CPUs (E5620 at 2.4GHz). The measures were obtained with the DPSNN-STDP simulator (Distributed Simulator of Polychronous Spiking Neural Network with synaptic Spike Timing Dependent Plasticity) developed by INFN, that already proved its efficient scalability and execution speed-up on hundreds of similar "server" cores and MPI processes, applied to neural nets composed of several billions of synapses.

Explore related subjects

cs.DC q-bio.NC

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Pier Stanislao Paolucci, Roberto Ammendola, Andrea Biagioni, Ottorino Frezza, Francesca Lo Cicero, Alessandro Lonardo, Michele Martinelli, Elena Pastorelli, Francesco Simula, Piero Vicini. 2015-05-12. Power, Energy and Speed of Embedded and Server Multi-Cores applied to Distributed Simulation of Spiking Neural Networks: ARM in NVIDIA Tegra vs Intel Xeon quad-cores. https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.03015

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Online Treasure Hunt in Vertex-Permuted Dynamic Rings

We study the problem of treasure hunt by a group of $k \geq 1$ agents in vertex-permuted dynamic rings (VP). In this model, the $n$ vertices remain on a ring but are permuted at each time step. We first show that treasure hunt is impossible for any $k \leq n-3$ agents, if there are no restrictions on the sequence of permutations used in the dynamic ring. We then study the $VP(\delta)$ setting, in which for every pair $i, j$ of vertices, the edge $(i, j)$ is guaranteed to appear within $\delta$ steps. We show that the class $VP(\delta)$ is feasible only for $\delta \geq \left\lceil \frac{n-1}{2}\right\rceil$. For the one-agent case, we show a tight bound of $\Theta(\delta n)$ on the worst-case search time as well as competitive ratio of any online algorithm for treasure hunt, provided $\delta \geq 2n$. We then give an optimal algorithm for $k$ agents, thereby showing that $k$ agents can obtain a speedup of $k$ on the worst-case search time. Finally, in the R-VP setting, in which in every step, the vertices are arranged as a ring according to a random permutation, we show that treasure hunt takes expected $\Theta(n)$ steps against an oblivious adversary and $\Theta(n \log n)$ steps against an adaptive adversary.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2026

The Computing Channel: How Modulation Programs the Airwaves

Distributed computing and distributed artificial intelligence require frequent exchanges of intermediate results, although many applications need only an aggregate rather than messages from individual devices. Conventional systems recover each message before computing the aggregate, whereas over-the-air computation (OAC) exploits simultaneous transmission to obtain it directly. However, dominant OAC implementations rely on analog signaling, creating a mismatch with finite-precision data and digital communication procedures. This article presents digital function-oriented communication, in which finite-alphabet symbol representations and receiver decisions are jointly designed so that multiple-access superposition encodes the desired function without recovering individual inputs. We introduce its computational-constellation principle, main design approaches, extensions, and implementation challenges. Federated edge learning illustrates how the framework can reduce user-dependent data-bearing resources while operating directly on quantized model updates.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2026

Can AI Remediate Backend Failures Safely? GuardedAct with Blast-Radius-Aware Sandboxing

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising capabilities in generating remediation actions for microservice failures. However, directly executing AI-generated repair actions in production risks cascading collateral damage. We propose GuardedAct, a sandbox-first remediation framework that interposes a blast-radius-aware verification layer between the LLM action generator and the production environment. GuardedAct operates in four phases: (1) ingesting a diagnosis report together with the live system topology and recent telemetry, (2) prompting an LLM to produce a ranked list of candidate remediation actions, (3) simulating each action in a lightweight digital-twin sandbox that estimates the blast radius and assigns a risk label, and (4) enforcing a rollback-confidence gate that auto-executes only low-risk actions while escalating high-risk ones for human review. We evaluate GuardedAct on five fault scenarios injected into the DeathStarBench social-network application. Experimental results show that GuardedAct achieves an overall recovery rate of 87.4% while reducing collateral damage by 79.7% relative to direct LLM execution (from 25.6% to 5.2%), at the cost of a modest sandbox-induced increase in mean time to recovery (approximately 8 s). Ablation studies confirm that each component contributes meaningfully to the safety-speed trade-off.

cs.DC↗