arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1505.02478

Integration on the Surreals: a Conjecture of Conway, Kruskal and Norton

Abstract

In his monograph On Numbers and Games, J. H. Conway introduced a real-closed field No of surreal numbers containing the reals and the ordinals, as well as a vast array of less familiar numbers. A longstanding aim has been to develop analysis on No as a powerful extension of ordinary analysis on the reals. This entails finding a natural way of extending important functions f from the reals to the reals to functions f* from the surreals to the surreals, and naturally defining integration on the f*. The usual square root, log, and exp were naturally extended to No by Bach, Conway, Kruskal, and Norton, retaining their usual properties. Later Norton also proposed a treatment of integration, but Kruskal discovered it has flaws. In his recent survey [2, p. 438], Siegel characterizes the question of the existence of a reasonable definition of surreal integration as "perhaps the most important open problem in the theory of surreal numbers." This paper addresses this and related unresolved issues with positive and negative results. In the positive direction, we show that semi-algebraic, semi-analytic, analytic, meromorphic, or more generally \'Ecalle-Borel transseriable functions extend naturally to No, and an integral with good properties exists on them. In the negative direction, we show there is a fundamental set-theoretic obstruction to naturally extending many larger families of functions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ovidiu Costin, Philip Ehrlich, Harvey M. Friedman. 2015-05-11. Integration on the Surreals: a Conjecture of Conway, Kruskal and Norton. https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.02478

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO