arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1504.05263

A Discrete Proof of The General Jordan-Schoenflies Theorem

Abstract

In the early 1960s, Brown and Mazur proved the general Jordan-Schoenflies theorem. This fundamental theorem states: If we embed an $(n-1)$ sphere $S^{(n-1)}$ locally flatly in an $n$ sphere $S^{n}$, then it decomposes $S^{n}$ into two components. In addition, the embedded $S^{(n-1)}$ is the common boundary of the two components and each component is homeomorphic to the $n$-ball.\newline This paper gives a constructive proof of the theorem using the discrete method. More specifically, we prove the equivalent statements: Let $M$ be an $n$-manifold, which is homeomorphic to $S^{n}$. Then, every $(n-1)$-manifold $S$, a submanifold with local flatness in $M$, decomposes the space $M$ into two components where each component is homeomorphic to an $n$-ball. The method was chosen in order to evaluate the computability and computational costs among operations between cells regarding homeomorphism. In addition, methods within the proof can be extended to applications in design algorithms under the assumption that homeomorphic mappings are constructible and computable. In this new revision, We add some new detailed discussions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Li Chen, Steven G. Krantz. 2015-04-20. A Discrete Proof of The General Jordan-Schoenflies Theorem. https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.05263

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Maximal Center of Distances of Finite Ultrametric Spaces and Perfect Binary Trees

We investigate the finite ultrametric spaces $(X,d)$ that have a given cardinality of the center of distances and a minimal cardinality of the set $X$. It is shown that such spaces are isometric if and only if their centers of distances are the same. The representing trees of these spaces are characterized up to isomorphism.

math.GN

A continuous $3$-distributive frame that is not $\omega$-distributive

We give a negative answer to the question, posed by Ern\'e, whether every $3$-distributive lattice is $\omega$-distributive. More precisely, we exhibit a continuous frame that is $\kappa$-distributive for every integer $\kappa\geq 2$, but is not a wide coframe. The frame is the open-set lattice of a compact, locally compact, countably based $T_0$ topological meet-semilattice, obtained from Lawson's construction in the logarithmic form described by Goubault-Larrecq. The failure of $\omega$-distributivity is witnessed by an explicit matrix with countably many nonempty finite rows: all row joins are the same nonzero element, whereas every choice of one entry from each row has meet zero. The same space answers negatively Ern\'e's accompanying question whether every $4$-web space is a wide web space. All properties of the construction needed for these conclusions are proved directly.

math.GN

An overlooked weakening of perfect normality: Perfect regularity in spaces and locales

We introduce the notion of perfect regularity as an appropriate weakening of perfect normality, both for spaces and locales. Various characterizations are given, using Dedekind-MacNeille completions, injective hulls, and sublocales. We place the new class of perfectly regular frames among various well-studied classes of frames. We also introduce the construction of perfect regularization of a completely regular frame, compare it to Isbell's well-known booleanization construction, and argue that it is at least as important as the latter.

math.GN