arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1412.3842

Degree Spectra of Relations on a Cone

Abstract

Let $\mathcal{A}$ be a mathematical structure with an additional relation $R$. We are interested in the degree spectrum of $R$, either among computable copies of $\mathcal{A}$ when $(\mathcal{A},R)$ is a "natural" structure, or (to make this rigorous) among copies of $(\mathcal{A},R)$ computable in a large degree \textbf{d}. We introduce the partial order of degree spectra \textit{on a cone} and begin the study of these objects. Using a result of Harizanov---that, assuming an effectiveness condition on $\mathcal{A}$ and $R$, if $R$ is not intrinsically computable, then its degree spectrum contains all c.e.\ degrees---we see that there is a minimal non-trivial degree spectrum on a cone, consisting of the c.e.\ degrees. We show that this does not generalize to d.c.e.\ degrees by giving an example of two incomparable degree spectra on a cone. We also give a partial answer to a question of Ash and Knight: they asked whether (subject to some effectiveness conditions) a relation which is not intrinsically $Δ^0_α$ must have a degree spectrum which contains all of the $α$-CEA degrees. We give a positive answer to this question for $α= 2$ by showing that any degree spectrum on a cone which strictly contains the $Δ^0_2$ degrees must contain all of the 2-CEA degrees. We also investigate the particular case of degree spectra on the structure $(ω,<)$. This work represents the beginning of an investigation of the degree spectra of "natural" structures, and we leave many open questions to be answered.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Matthew Harrison-Trainor. 2014-12-11. Degree Spectra of Relations on a Cone. https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.3842

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO