arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1411.6158

Second-order adjoint sensitivity analysis procedure (SO-ASAP) for computing exactly and efficiently first- and second-order sensitivities in large-scale linear systems:II. Illustrative application to a paradigm particle diffusion problem

Dan G. Cacuci
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This work presents an illustrative application of the second-order adjoint sensitivity analysis procedure (SO-ASAP) to a paradigm neutron diffusion problem, which is sufficiently simple to admit an exact solution, thereby making transparent the mathematical derivations underlying the SO-ASAP. The illustrative application presented in this work shows that the actual number of adjoint computations needed for computing all of the first- and second-order response sensitivities may significantly less than 2*N+1 per response. For this illustrative problem, four (4) large-scale adjoint computations sufficed for the complete and exact computations of all 4 first- and 10 distinct second-order derivatives. Furthermore, the construction and solution of the SASS requires very little additional effort beyond the construction of the adjoint sensitivity system needed for computing the first-order sensitivities. Only the sources on the right-sides of the diffusion operator needed to be modified; the left-side of the differential equations remained unchanged. Most of the second-order relative sensitivities are just as large as or larger than the first-order ones. We show that the second-order sensitivities cause the expected value of the response to differ from the computed nominal value of the response; and they contribute decisively to causing asymmetries in the response distribution. Neglecting the second-order sensitivities would nullify the third-order response correlations, and hence would nullify the skewness of the response; consequently, any events occurring in a response's long and/or short tails, which are characteristic of rare but decisive events would likely be missed. We expect the SO-ASAP to affect significantly other fields that need efficiently computed second-order response sensitivities, e.g., optimization, data assimilation/adjustment, model calibration, and predictive modeling.

Explore related subjects

math-phmath.MP

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Dan G. Cacuci. 2014-11-22. Second-order adjoint sensitivity analysis procedure (SO-ASAP) for computing exactly and efficiently first- and second-order sensitivities in large-scale linear systems:II. Illustrative application to a paradigm particle diffusion problem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2014.11.030

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why we should condition denoising diffusion generative models on windows of past observations

Data assimilation (DA) is, traditionally, a cycling process that relies on time-dependent priors to propagate information from past observations to future cycles. Using denoising diffusion generative modeling for DA is challenging because standard approaches use a fixed training data set, which in turn leads to a static prior that ignores information from past observations. Because past observations are ignored, DA systems with static priors lead to larger posterior errors than cycling DA systems. Incorporating time-dependent priors into generative models, however, requires expensive and frequent retraining. Motivated by linear systems theory - where the dependence of a prediction of a Kalman filter on past observations decays exponentially - we condition diffusion models on short windows of past observations. Specifically, we describe training procedures for two frameworks: a diffusion DA system predicting the current state given a set of past observations, and a diffusion ``direct observation prediction'' (DOP) system, predicting future observations given a set of past observations. Using a canonical linear system, we show that both systems can achieve the minimal posterior error characteristic of a fully-cycled DA/DOP system, without re-training, provided the time windows are long enough. The linear setup ensures analytical tractability, avoids confounding neural network training errors, and confirms that conditioning on windows of past observations is required for efficient and accurate diffusion-based DA or DOP.

math-ph↗
arXiv2026

The kinematic structures and the inertial geometry of a moving charge

We ask how much of the geometry a charged particle moves in is fixed by its motion, and how much a particle must bring. We ask of a symplectic structure only that it relate velocity to momentum as Hamilton's equations do, and we ask it of every energy at once. In particular, we show that the structures meeting that demand are the canonical one and its twists by a closed two-form of the base. A field provides the two-form, a particle the multiplier before it, which we identify constitutively with its charge. Thus, a single energy governs a family of structures, and each particle takes the one its charge fixes. We then ask what a particle must bring to be given a momentum, and we show that the degree of that map settles the degree at which a field enters Newton's Second Law. An antisymmetric bilinear form returns no Lorentz force, whilst a Randers metric returns one --- a length whose difference from a Riemannian one is linear in the velocity. Moreover, we find that metric already within the twisted structure, as its primitive over a level of the free energy, and its law of transport to be nonlinear, no affine connection being known to serve. Under an indefinite signature the length parts from the dynamics, and the extremals turn from shortest to longest. On the round sphere a monopole flux leaves no such metric, whilst the transport remains and prequantisation, given a unit of action, restricts the charge to a lattice. In this manner, we conclude that each charge-to-mass ratio receives a geometry of its own, so that by a functionalist criterion none of them is the spacetime of a charged particle.

math-ph↗