Tight tradeoffs for approximating palindromes in streams

Paweł Gawrychowski; Przemysław Uznański

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1410.6433

Tight tradeoffs for approximating palindromes in streams

Paweł Gawrychowski·Przemysław Uznański

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We consider computing the longest palindrome in a text of length $n$ in the streaming model, where the characters arrive one-by-one, and we do not have random access to the input. While computing the answer exactly using sublinear memory is not possible in such a setting, one can still hope for a good approximation guarantee. We focus on the two most natural variants, where we aim for either additive or multiplicative approximation of the length of the longest palindrome. We first show that there is no point in considering Las Vegas algorithms in such a setting, as they cannot achieve sublinear space complexity. For Monte Carlo algorithms, we provide a lowerbound of $\Omega(\frac{n}{E})$ bits for approximating the answer with additive error $E$, and $\Omega(\frac{\log n}{\log(1+\varepsilon)})$ bits for approximating the answer with multiplicative error $(1+\varepsilon)$ for the binary alphabet. Then, we construct a generic Monte Carlo algorithm, which by choosing the parameters appropriately achieves space complexity matching up to a logarithmic factor for both variants. This substantially improves the previous results by Berenbrink et al. (STACS 2014) and essentially settles the space complexity.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Paweł Gawrychowski, Przemysław Uznański. 2014-10-23. Tight tradeoffs for approximating palindromes in streams. https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.6433

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗