arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1405.6785

Optimal Algorithms for $L_1$-subspace Signal Processing

Abstract

We describe ways to define and calculate $L_1$-norm signal subspaces which are less sensitive to outlying data than $L_2$-calculated subspaces. We start with the computation of the $L_1$ maximum-projection principal component of a data matrix containing $N$ signal samples of dimension $D$. We show that while the general problem is formally NP-hard in asymptotically large $N$, $D$, the case of engineering interest of fixed dimension $D$ and asymptotically large sample size $N$ is not. In particular, for the case where the sample size is less than the fixed dimension ($N<D$), we present in explicit form an optimal algorithm of computational cost $2^N$. For the case $N \geq D$, we present an optimal algorithm of complexity $\mathcal O(N^D)$. We generalize to multiple $L_1$-max-projection components and present an explicit optimal $L_1$ subspace calculation algorithm of complexity $\mathcal O(N^{DK-K+1})$ where $K$ is the desired number of $L_1$ principal components (subspace rank). We conclude with illustrations of $L_1$-subspace signal processing in the fields of data dimensionality reduction, direction-of-arrival estimation, and image conditioning/restoration.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Panos P. Markopoulos, George N. Karystinos, Dimitris A. Pados. 2014-05-27. Optimal Algorithms for $L_1$-subspace Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsp.2014.2338077

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS