arXiv · 1405.1360
Assessing the statistical significance of association rules
Abstract
An association rule is statistically significant, if it has a small probability to occur by chance. It is well-known that the traditional frequency-confidence framework does not produce statistically significant rules. It can both accept spurious rules (type 1 error) and reject significant rules (type 2 error). The same problem concerns other commonly used interestingness measures and pruning heuristics. In this paper, we inspect the most common measure functions - frequency, confidence, degree of dependence, $χ^2$, correlation coefficient, and $J$-measure - and redundancy reduction techniques. For each technique, we analyze whether it can make type 1 or type 2 error and the conditions under which the error occurs. In addition, we give new theoretical results which can be use to guide the search for statistically significant association rules.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Wilhelmiina Hämäläinen. 2014-05-06. Assessing the statistical significance of association rules. https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.1360
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.