arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1404.7348

Topics in Ramsey Theory

Abstract

Ramsey theory is the study of conditions under which mathematical objects show order when partitioned. Ramsey theory on the integers concerns itself with partitions of $[1,n]$ into $r$ subsets and asks the question whether one (or more) of these $r$ subsets contains a $k$-term member of $\mathcal{F}$, where $[1,n]=\{1,2,3,\ldots,n\}$ and $\mathcal{F}$ is a certain family of subsets of $\mathbb{Z}^+$. When $\mathcal{F}$ is fixed to be the set of arithmetic progressions, the corresponding Ramsey-type numbers are called the van der Waerden numbers. I started the project choosing $\mathcal{F}$ to be the set of semi-progressions of scope $m$. A semi-progression of scope $m\in \mathbb{Z}^+$ is a set of integers $\{x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_k\}$ such that for some $d\in\mathbb{Z}^+$, $x_{i}-x_{i-1}\in\{d,2d,\ldots,md\}$ for all $i\in\{2,3,\ldots,k\}$. The exact values of Ramsey-type functions corresponding to semi-progressions are not known. We use $SP_m(k)$ to denote these numbers as a Ramsey-type function of $k$ for a fixed scope $m$. During this project, I used the probabilistic method to get an exponential lower bound for any fixed $m$. The first chapter starts with a brief introduction to Ramsey theory and then explains the problem considered. In the second chapter, I give the results obtained on semi-progressions. In the third chapter, I will discuss the lower bound obtained on $Q_1(k)$. When $\mathcal{F}$ is chosen to be quasi-progressions of diameter $n$, the corresponding Ramsey-type numbers obtained are denoted as $Q_n(k)$. The last chapter gives an exposition of advanced probabilistic techniques, in particular concentration inequalities and how to apply them.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mano Vikash Janardhanan. 2014-04-29. Topics in Ramsey Theory. https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.7348

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Balanced even cycles in signed graphs:Tur\'an bounds, double covers, and parity obstructions

We study Tur\'an problems for balanced even cycles in simple signed graphs, where signed subgraphs are considered up to switching. For every balanced bipartite signed graph, the signed and ordinary Tur\'an numbers differ by at most a factor of two. Our main structural results concern the underlying graphs that admit a signing in which every $2k$-cycle is unbalanced. We characterize these graphs by the absence of an odd dependence among their $2k$-cycle incidence vectors, give a cohomological formulation, and construct subgraph-minimal obstructions of arbitrarily large order. In particular, there is no finite forbidden-subgraph characterization. We also give an exact closed-walk criterion for cycles in double covers and derive a direct signed breadth-first-search upper bound. As applications, we prove \[ \hex(n,C_{+4})=\left(\frac{\sqrt2}{2}+o(1)\right)n^{3/2} \] and study the signed hexagon number $R_6(n)=\hex(n,\{C_{-3},C_{+6}\})$. We characterize the underlying graphs counted by $R_6$ and express it as an extremal problem for ordinary $C_6$-free graphs with a prescribed involution. For every sufficiently large $n$, we construct examples with $\Omega(n^{4/3})$ edges, and we give an equivariant construction attaining the coefficient obtained from the F\"uredi--Naor--Verstra\"ete lower bound by double-cover transfer. Finally, we give $n$-vertex $C_{+10}$-free signed graphs with $\Omega(n^{6/5})$ edges and use octagon examples to illustrate the limitations of theta-freeness as a signing criterion.

math.CO

Fractional DP-colorings of $d$-degenerate locally sparse graphs

Bernshteyn, Kostochka, and Zhu (2020) introduced the notion of fractional DP-coloring, which generalizes both fractional coloring and fractional list coloring. Among several foundational results, they proved that every $d$-degenerate bipartite graph $G$ satisfies $\chi_f^{\mathrm{DP}} \le (1 + o(1))\frac{d}{\log d}$, and that this bound is optimal---a stark contrast to ordinary fractional coloring. In this paper, we extend this upper bound to all $d$-degenerate triangle-free graphs, proving that $\chi_f^{\mathrm{DP}} \le (4 + o(1))\frac{d}{\log d}$. This generalizes a recent result of Martinsson and Steiner (2025) for ordinary fractional coloring. We derive this result as a corollary of a more general upper bound concerning locally sparse graph orderings. Specifically, a $d$-degenerate graph $G$ is left $k$-locally-sparse if it admits a degeneracy ordering in which, for every vertex $v$, the subgraph induced by its back-neighbors contains at most $k$ edges. We show that if a $d$-degenerate graph $G$ is left $\frac{d^2}{f}$-locally-sparse, then \[ \chi_f^{\mathrm{DP}}(G) \le (8 + o(1))\frac{d}{\log f}. \] This immediately yields an identical upper bound on the ordinary fractional chromatic number $\chi_f(G)$, improving upon the leading constants of previously known bounds. Additionally, we establish the asymptotic sharpness of this result up to the leading constant. For any $1 \ll f \le d^2$, we construct $d$-degenerate graphs that are left $\frac{d^2}{f}$-locally-sparse and satisfy $\chi_f(G) \ge (1 - o(1))\frac{d}{\log f}$. Finally, as applications of our main theorem, we obtain improved upper bounds on the fractional DP-chromatic number of $d$-degenerate $K_{1,t,t}$-free graphs, as well as $K_{t,t,t}$-free graphs with maximum degree $\Delta$. Notably, these bounds improve upon existing results even in the setting of ordinary fractional coloring.

math.CO

Erd\H{o}s-S\'{o}s for digraphs

It is shown that every Eulerian digraph on $n$ vertices with more than $(t-1)n$ arcs contains every oriented tree with $t$ edges. The digraphs have no loops or repeated arcs, but opposite arcs are permitted. The bound is sharp for each fixed oriented tree, as witnessed by disjoint unions of complete bidirected graphs. Previously, such tight bounds were not known, even just for directed paths. This can be considered as a directed analog of the recently proved Erd\H{o}s-S\'os conjecture. The result was proved by GPT-6 Astra.

math.CO