arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1404.5975

Is there a computable upper bound for the height of a solution of a Diophantine equation with a unique solution in positive integers?

Abstract

Let B_n={x_i \cdot x_j=x_k, x_i+1=x_k: i,j,k \in {1,...,n}}. For a positive integer n, let \xi(n) denote the smallest positive integer b such that for each system S \subseteq B_n with a unique solution in positive integers x_1,...,x_n, this solution belongs to [1,b]^n. Let g(1)=1, and let g(n+1)=2^{2^{g(n)}} for every positive integer n. We conjecture that \xi(n) \leq g(2n) for every positive integer n. We prove: (1) the function \xi: N\{0}-->N\{0} is computable in the limit; (2) if a function f:N\{0}-->N\{0} has a single-fold Diophantine representation, then there exists a positive integer m such that f(n)<\xi(n) for every integer n>m; (3) the conjecture implies that there exists an algorithm which takes as input a Diophantine equation D(x_1,...,x_p)=0 and returns a positive integer d with the following property: for every positive integers a_1,...,a_p, if the tuple (a_1,...,a_p) solely solves the equation D(x_1,...,x_p)=0 in positive integers, then a_1,...,a_p \leq d; (4) the conjecture implies that if a set M \subseteq N has a single-fold Diophantine representation, then M is computable; (5) for every integer n>9, the inequality \xi(n)<(2^{2^{n-5}}-1)^{2^{n-5}}+1 implies that 2^{2^{n-5}}+1 is composite.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Apoloniusz Tyszka. 2014-04-24. Is there a computable upper bound for the height of a solution of a Diophantine equation with a unique solution in positive integers?. https://doi.org/10.1515/comp-2017-0003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO