arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1312.5932

Strictly convergent analytic structures

Abstract

We give conclusive answers to some questions about definability in analytic languages that arose shortly after the work by Denef and van den Dries, [DD], on $p$-adic subanalytic sets, and we continue the study of non-archimedean fields with analytic structure of [LR3], [CLR1] and [CL1]. We show that the language $L_K$ consisting of the language of valued fields together with all strictly convergent power series over a complete, rank one valued field $K$ can be expanded, in a definitial way, to a larger language corresponding to an analytic structure (with separated power series) from [CL1], hence inheriting all properties from loc. cit., including geometric properties for the definable sets like certain forms of quantifier elimination. Our expansion comes from adding specific, existentially definable functions, which are solutions of certain henselian systems of equations. Moreover, we show that, even when $K$ is algebraically closed, one does not have quantifier elimination in $L_K$ itself, and hence, passing to expansions is unavoidable in general. We pursue this study in the wider generality of extending non-separated power series rings to separated ones, and give new examples, in particular of the analytic structure over $\mathbb{Z}[[t]]$ that can be interpreted and understood now in all complete valued fields. In a separate direction, we show in rather large generality that Weierstrass preparation implies Weierstrass division.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Raf Cluckers, Leonard Lipshitz. 2014-03-31. Strictly convergent analytic structures. https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.5932

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO