arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1312.2164

Budgeted Influence Maximization for Multiple Products

Nan Du·Yingyu Liang·Maria Florina Balcan·Le Song
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The typical algorithmic problem in viral marketing aims to identify a set of influential users in a social network, who, when convinced to adopt a product, shall influence other users in the network and trigger a large cascade of adoptions. However, the host (the owner of an online social platform) often faces more constraints than a single product, endless user attentions, unlimited budget and unbounded time; in reality, multiple products need to be advertised, each user can tolerate only a small number of recommendations, influencing user has a cost and advertisers have only limited budgets, and the adoptions need to be maximized within a short time window. Given theses myriads of user, monetary, and timing constraints, it is extremely challenging for the host to design principled and efficient viral market algorithms with provable guarantees. In this paper, we provide a novel solution by formulating the problem as a submodular maximization in a continuous-time diffusion model under an intersection of a matroid and multiple knapsack constraints. We also propose an adaptive threshold greedy algorithm which can be faster than the traditional greedy algorithm with lazy evaluation, and scalable to networks with million of nodes. Furthermore, our mathematical formulation allows us to prove that the algorithm can achieve an approximation factor of $k_a/(2+2 k)$ when $k_a$ out of the $k$ knapsack constraints are active, which also improves over previous guarantees from combinatorial optimization literature. In the case when influencing each user has uniform cost, the approximation becomes even better to a factor of $1/3$. Extensive synthetic and real world experiments demonstrate that our budgeted influence maximization algorithm achieves the-state-of-the-art in terms of both effectiveness and scalability, often beating the next best by significant margins.

Explore related subjects

cs.LGcs.SIstat.ML

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Nan Du, Yingyu Liang, Maria Florina Balcan, Le Song. 2013-12-08. Budgeted Influence Maximization for Multiple Products. https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.2164

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗