arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1311.7589

Online Algorithms with Advice for Bin Packing and Scheduling Problems

Abstract

We consider the setting of online computation with advice, and study the bin packing problem and a number of scheduling problems. We show that it is possible, for any of these problems, to arbitrarily approach a competitive ratio of $1$ with only a constant number of bits of advice per request. For the bin packing problem, we give an online algorithm with advice that is $(1+\varepsilon)$-competitive and uses $O\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\log \frac{1}{\varepsilon} \right)$ bits of advice per request. For scheduling on $m$ identical machines, with the objective function of any of makespan, machine covering and the minimization of the $\ell_p$ norm, $p >1$, we give similar results. We give online algorithms with advice which are $(1+\varepsilon)$-competitive ($(1/(1-\varepsilon))$-competitive for machine covering) and also use $O\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\log \frac{1}{\varepsilon} \right)$ bits of advice per request. We complement our results by giving a lower bound showing that for any online algorithm with advice to be optimal, for any of the above scheduling problems, a non-constant number (namely, at least $\left(1 - \frac{2m}{n}\right)\log m$, where $n$ is the number of jobs and $m$ is the number of machines) of bits of advice per request is needed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Marc P. Renault, Adi Rosén, Rob van Stee. 2013-11-29. Online Algorithms with Advice for Bin Packing and Scheduling Problems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2015.07.050

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS