arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1309.1937

Inside the Muchnik Degrees II: The Degree Structures induced by the Arithmetical Hierarchy of Countably Continuous Functions

Kojiro Higuchi·Takayuki Kihara
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

It is known that infinitely many Medvedev degrees exist inside the Muchnik degree of any nontrivial $Π^0_1$ subset of Cantor space. We shed light on the fine structures inside these Muchnik degrees related to learnability and piecewise computability. As for nonempty $Π^0_1$ subsets of Cantor space, we show the existence of a finite-$Δ^0_2$-piecewise degree containing infinitely many finite-$(Π^0_1)_2$-piecewise degrees, and a finite-$(Π^0_2)_2$-piecewise degree containing infinitely many finite-$Δ^0_2$-piecewise degrees (where $(Π^0_n)_2$ denotes the difference of two $Π^0_n$ sets), whereas the greatest degrees in these three "finite-$Γ$-piecewise" degree structures coincide. Moreover, as for nonempty $Π^0_1$ subsets of Cantor space, we also show that every nonzero finite-$(Π^0_1)_2$-piecewise degree includes infinitely many Medvedev (i.e., one-piecewise) degrees, every nonzero countable-$Δ^0_2$-piecewise degree includes infinitely many finite-piecewise degrees, every nonzero finite-$(Π^0_2)_2$-countable-$Δ^0_2$-piecewise degree includes infinitely many countable-$Δ^0_2$-piecewise degrees, and every nonzero Muchnik (i.e., countable-$Π^0_2$-piecewise) degree includes infinitely many finite-$(Π^0_2)_2$-countable-$Δ^0_2$-piecewise degrees. Indeed, we show that any nonzero Medvedev degree and nonzero countable-$Δ^0_2$-piecewise degree of a nonempty $Π^0_1$ subset of Cantor space have the strong anticupping properties. Finally, we obtain an elementary difference between the Medvedev (Muchnik) degree structure and the finite-$Γ$-piecewise degree structure of all subsets of Baire space by showing that none of the finite-$Γ$-piecewise structures are Brouwerian, where $Γ$ is any of the Wadge classes mentioned above.

Explore related subjects

math.LOcs.LO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Kojiro Higuchi, Takayuki Kihara. 2013-09-08. Inside the Muchnik Degrees II: The Degree Structures induced by the Arithmetical Hierarchy of Countably Continuous Functions. https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.1937

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO↗