arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 1307.3235

The sign rule and beyond: Boundary effects, flexibility, and noise correlations in neural population codes

Abstract

Over repeat presentations of the same stimulus, sensory neurons show variable responses. This "noise" is typically correlated between pairs of cells, and a question with rich history in neuroscience is how these noise correlations impact the population's ability to encode the stimulus. Here, we consider a very general setting for population coding, investigating how information varies as a function of noise correlations, with all other aspects of the problem - neural tuning curves, etc. - held fixed. This work yields unifying insights into the role of noise correlations. These are summarized in the form of theorems, and illustrated with numerical examples involving neurons with diverse tuning curves. Our main contributions are as follows. (1) We generalize previous results to prove a sign rule (SR) - if noise correlations between pairs of neurons have opposite signs vs. their signal correlations, then coding performance will improve compared to the independent case. This holds for three different metrics of coding performance, and for arbitrary tuning curves and levels of heterogeneity. This generality is true for our other results as well. (2) As also pointed out in the literature, the SR does not provide a necessary condition for good coding. We show that a diverse set of correlation structures can improve coding. Many of these violate the SR, as do experimentally observed correlations. There is structure to this diversity: we prove that the optimal correlation structures must lie on boundaries of the possible set of noise correlations. (3) We provide a novel set of necessary and sufficient conditions, under which the coding performance (in the presence of noise) will be as good as it would be if there were no noise present at all.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yu Hu, Joel Zylberberg, Eric Shea-Brown. 2014-01-15. The sign rule and beyond: Boundary effects, flexibility, and noise correlations in neural population codes. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003469

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Intrinsic Brain Networks Underlying the Experience and Expression of Subclinical Anxiety

Anxiety encompasses behavioral, physiological, and subjective components that do not always align, yet it remains unclear whether these dimensions are supported by distinct intrinsic brain networks. Drawing on the two-system framework, we examined whether resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) differentiates these components in subclinical anxiety. Forty-seven young adults with varying levels of subclinical anxiety completed a threat anticipation task to assess anxiety-modulated behavioral responses (reaction time) and physiological arousal (skin conductance), alongside the NIH Fear-Affect self-report measure of anxiety severity. These measures were then related to rsFC using independent component analysis. Higher levels of subclinical anxiety were associated with faster responses during temporally uncertain threat, consistent with escape-like behavior, whereas no relationship emerged between subclinical anxiety and physiological arousal. At the neural level, three distinct connectivity patterns remained significant after sequential false discovery rate correction. Anxiety-modulated behavioral responses were associated with stronger connectivity between the default mode network and regions in the visual cortex and paracingulate gyrus. Physiological modulation by subclinical anxiety was linked to connectivity between the salience network and the visual cortex. In contrast, subjective anxiety was associated with connectivity between the cerebellar network and regions in the frontal, parietal, and visual cortices. Together, these findings suggest that the behavioral, physiological, and subjective dimensions of subclinical anxiety are supported by functionally and spatially dissociable intrinsic brain networks. These results extend previous task-based findings to resting-state connectivity and provide new insights into the intrinsic neural architecture of subclinical anxiety.

q-bio.NC↗

From Signals to Trajectories: A Primer on Low-Dimensional Dynamics in Human EEG and MEG

Neural activity unfolds not as a set of independent signals, but as a coordinated dynamical process that can be described as a point moving through a high-dimensional state space. This perspective has contributed substantially to recent developments in systems neuroscience, especially through studies of directly recorded neuronal population activity, but remains comparatively underused in non-invasive human recordings such as EEG and MEG. In this primer, we present a neural trajectory analysis based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA) as an accessible route into extending the concepts of neural trajectories in state space to human electrophysiology. We explain how EEG/MEG activity can be organized into neural state representations, projected onto axes organized by decreasing covariance, truncated into low-dimensional representations, and visualized as trajectories that capture how distributed activity evolves over time. We show how trajectory geometry can be used to compare conditions and relate neural dynamics to behavior or clinical outcomes. An example of EEG motor execution and imagery, accompanied by a tutorial notebook, illustrates the workflow from conventional EEG summaries to trajectory-based analysis. We also clarify the limits of PCA, including its linear, variance-driven nature, and discuss EEG/MEG-specific challenges such as spatial mixing, preprocessing sensitivity, validation, and overinterpretation. Finally, we situate PCA within a broader family of state-space methods. By making neural trajectories practical and interpretable, this primer offers a guide for bringing the conceptual framework of population-level dynamics into mainstream human cognitive neuroscience.

q-bio.NC↗

Grid-cell firing fields lack local sixfold symmetry

The firing fields of a grid cell form a hexagonal lattice, yet each field's intrinsic geometric structure remains unclear: Are individual grid fields radially symmetric or do they exhibit (weak) sixfold modulation inherited from the global lattice? To address this question, we quantified the within-field angular structure using harmonic analysis and per-cell matched simulations that preserved sampling statistics, field scale, and lattice geometry after correction for global elliptic deformation. We found that, across the investigated cells, the sixfold harmonic power fraction was consistent with values from matched locally circular reference fields. Experimental fields further showed substantially less sixfold modulation than matched simulations with an imposed local sixfold component, demonstrating sensitivity to sixfold structure at that level. This conclusion was supported by a complementary sixfold regression metric, harmonic leave-one-out sensitivity analyses, and robustness checks across radial-window choices, smoothing, and simulated background-noise levels. An observation-matched Burak--Fiete continuous-attractor network likewise showed no selective local sixfold enhancement despite its globally periodic grid structure, and this conclusion persisted when grid scale and relative field width were matched more closely to the experimental regime. These results suggest that the global hexagonal lattice organization need not be accompanied by detectable local sixfold angular modulation of individual firing fields, placing quantitative constraints on grid-field microstructure and mechanistic models of grid formation.

q-bio.NC↗