arXiv · 1307.2209
A comparison of period finding algorithms
Abstract
This paper presents a comparison of popular period finding algorithms applied to the light curves of variable stars from the Catalina Real-time Transient Survey (CRTS), MACHO and ASAS data sets. We analyze the accuracy of the methods against magnitude, sampling rates, quoted period, quality measures (signal-to-noise and number of observations), variability, and object classes. We find that measure of dispersion-based techniques - analysis-of-variance with harmonics and conditional entropy - consistently give the best results but there are clear dependencies on object class and light curve quality. Period aliasing and identifying a period harmonic also remain significant issues. We consider the performance of the algorithms and show that a new conditional entropy-based algorithm is the most optimal in terms of completeness and speed. We also consider a simple ensemble approach and find that it performs no better than individual algorithms.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Matthew J. Graham, Andrew J. Drake, S. G. Djorgovski, Ashish A. Mahabal, Ciro Donalek, Victor Duan, Alison Maher. 2013-07-08. A comparison of period finding algorithms. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras%2Fstt1264
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.