The Promise Polynomial Hierarchy

Adam Chalcraft; Samuel Kutin; David Petrie Moulton

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1305.5561

The Promise Polynomial Hierarchy

Adam Chalcraft·Samuel Kutin·David Petrie Moulton

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The polynomial hierarchy is a grading of problems by difficulty, including P, NP and coNP as the best known classes. The promise polynomial hierarchy is similar, but extended to include promise problems. It turns out that the promise polynomial hierarchy is considerably simpler to work with, and many open questions about the polynomial hierarchy can be resolved in the promise polynomial hierarchy. Our main theorem is that, in the world of promise problems, if phi has a weak (Turing, Cook) reduction to SAT then phi has a strong (Karp, many-one) reduction to UVAL2, where UVAL2(f) is the promise problem of finding the unique x such that f(x,y)=1 for all y. We also give a complete promise problem for the promise problem equivalent of UP intersect coUP.

Explore related subjects

cs.CC

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Adam Chalcraft, Samuel Kutin, David Petrie Moulton. 2013-07-30. The Promise Polynomial Hierarchy. https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.5561

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The Computational Complexity of Holant Problems on 4-regular Graphs from the Stable Subgroup Sequence of $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$

The Holant framework provides a general setting for studying counting problems and includes graph homomorphisms (\#GH) and counting constraint satisfaction problems (\#CSP) as special cases. Over the past twenty years, a series of computational complexity dichotomies have been established for Holant problems, but the classification for complex-valued signatures is still open. The main obstacle is the case in which all signatures have even arity. In this paper, we establish a dichotomy for Holant problems with a complex-valued 4-ary signature, which is a key base case for the full classification of Holant problems. We present a new strategy by introducing Schur's theorem, the classification of finite subgroups of $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C})$ and stable subgroup sequences into the proof. These new techniques are of independent interest.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2026

Max Independent Set Remains NP-hard when Excluding a Planar Induced Minor

We show that there is a fixed planar graph $H$, namely the $5 \times 5$ grid, such that Max Independent Set remains NP-hard in $H$-induced-minor-free graphs. This refutes the Dallard--Milani\v{c}--\v{S}torgel conjecture and a weakening of it by Gartland and Lokshtanov, and by Korhonen.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2026

Topology inside NC$^1$

We show that ACC$^0$ is precisely what can be computed with constant-width circuits of polynomial size and polylogarithmic genus. This extends a characterization given by Hansen, showing that planar constant-width circuits also characterize ACC$^0$. Thus polylogarithmic genus provides no additional computational power in this model. We consider other generalizations of planarity, including crossing number and thickness. We show that constant-width circuits of polynomial size and thickness two already suffice to capture all of NC$^1$.

cs.CC↗