arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1302.3946

Approximating the optimal competitive ratio for an ancient online scheduling problem

Lin Chen·Deshi Ye·Guochuan Zhang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We consider the classical online scheduling problem P||C_{max} in which jobs are released over list and provide a nearly optimal online algorithm. More precisely, an online algorithm whose competitive ratio is at most (1+\epsilon) times that of an optimal online algorithm could be achieved in polynomial time, where m, the number of machines, is a part of the input. It substantially improves upon the previous results by almost closing the gap between the currently best known lower bound of 1.88 (Rudin, Ph.D thesis, 2001) and the best known upper bound of 1.92 (Fleischer, Wahl, Journal of Scheduling, 2000). It has been known by folklore that an online problem could be viewed as a game between an adversary and the online player. Our approach extensively explores such a structure and builds up a completely new framework to show that, for the online over list scheduling problem, given any \epsilon>0, there exists a uniform threshold K which is polynomial in m such that if the competitive ratio of an online algorithm is \rho<=2, then there exists a list of at most K jobs to enforce the online algorithm to achieve a competitive ratio of at least \rho-O(\epsilon). Our approach is substantially different from that of Gunther et al. (Gunther et al., SODA 2013), in which an approximation scheme for online over time scheduling problems is given, where the number of machines is fixed. Our method could also be extended to several related online over list scheduling models.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Lin Chen, Deshi Ye, Guochuan Zhang. 2013-02-16. Approximating the optimal competitive ratio for an ancient online scheduling problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/1302.3946

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗