arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1212.0564

Inside catalogs: a comparison of source extraction software

M. Annunziatella·A. Mercurio·M. Brescia·S. Cavuoti·G. Longo
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The scope of this paper is to compare the catalog extraction performances obtained using the new combination of SExtractor with PSFEx, against the more traditional and diffuse application of DAOPHOT with ALLSTAR; therefore, the paper may provide a guide for the selection of the most suitable catalog extraction software. Both software packages were tested on two kinds of simulated images having, respectively, a uniform spatial distribution of sources and an overdensity in the center. In both cases, SExtractor is able to generate a deeper catalog than DAOPHOT. Moreover, the use of neural networks for object classification plus the novel SPREAD\_MODEL parameter push down to the limiting magnitude the possibility of star/galaxy separation. DAOPHOT and ALLSTAR provide an optimal solution for point-source photometry in stellar fields and very accurate and reliable PSF photometry, with robust star-galaxy separation. However, they are not useful for galaxy characterization, and do not generate catalogs that are very complete for faint sources. On the other hand, SExtractor, along with the new capability to derive PSF photometry, turns to be competitive and returns accurate photometry also for galaxies. We can assess that the new version of SExtractor, used in conjunction with PSFEx, represents a very powerful software package for source extraction with performances comparable to those of DAOPHOT. Finally, by comparing the results obtained in the case of a uniform and of an overdense spatial distribution of stars, we notice, for both software packages, a decline for the latter case in the quality of the results produced in terms of magnitudes and centroids.

Explore related subjects

astro-ph.IM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M. Annunziatella, A. Mercurio, M. Brescia, S. Cavuoti, G. Longo. 2012-12-03. Inside catalogs: a comparison of source extraction software. https://doi.org/10.1086/669333

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Validation of Satellite Lifetime Predictions at Leonid Space

This paper validates Leonid Space's satellite lifetime prediction pipeline through a backtesting campaign of 878 deorbited satellites spanning six decades of spaceflight, showing that it accurately recreates their last year of flight. The pipeline combines a custom high-speed orbit propagator, ballistic coefficient estimation from on-orbit TLE data, atmospheric density corrections from data assimilation, custom space weather forecasts, and probabilistic Monte Carlo analysis. Validation proceeds in four steps that progressively remove the benefit of hindsight: starting from a "perfect knowledge" scenario using actual space weather data and ephemerides, we gradually replace historical data with contemporary predictions to arrive at a fully predictive scenario analogous to a deorbit prediction performed for a spacecraft flying today. These forecasts are scored using the continuously ranked probability score and root mean square calibration error, yielding a median one-year prediction accuracy of 3.9 days (1.1%) with perfect knowledge and 44.9 days (12.3%) in the fully predictive scenario. Solar flux forecasts contribute 89% of the variance in our predictions, dominating all other sources of error. To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive backtesting of long-term satellite lifetime predictions that reports quantitative results for the fully predictive case, and it establishes a new framework for scoring solar cycle forecasts by grounding forecast accuracy in operationally-relevant satellite lifetime predictions.

astro-ph.IM↗
arXiv2026

CHRONOS Science Program

Cryogenic sub-Hz cROss torsion-bar detector with quantum NOn-demolition Speed meter (CHRONOS) is a proposed cryogenic torsion-bar interferometer for precision measurements in the 0.1-10 Hz band. A Sagnac speed-meter readout, power and signal recycling, and balanced homodyne detection provide control of the optical response and quantum measurement correlations. This White Paper describes the science program, detector design, calibration, and staged experimental development. The reference sensitivity uses a multi-input quantum model, including rear-mirror vacuum fields and measurement-back-action correlations, combined with classical noise. Two operating points are optimized for complementary power-law-integrated sensitivity objectives. Gravitational-wave forecasts use this common noise budget and state their source and observing assumptions. The program includes intermediate-mass black-hole binaries, stochastic backgrounds, quantum measurement, and terrestrial gravity perturbations. Dark-matter applications are discussed as response and feasibility studies. A differential gravitational calibrator provides a proposed Yukawa-gravity test whose systematic floor is improved by subtracting auxiliary harmonics. These are conditional projections: experimental reach requires validation of the noise, transfer functions, environmental backgrounds, and systematic uncertainties described here.

astro-ph.IM↗
arXiv2026

pynucastro 3: A community library for nuclear astrophysics

We describe the latest release of pynucastro: a community python library for nuclear astrophysics. The goal of the pynucastro project is to build the tools needed to interactively explore nuclear properties, reaction rates, and networks, and to export these networks to a variety of simulation codes. Major changes in pynucastro since the last major release include new rate approximations, a stellar equation of state, support for the StarLib library and rate uncertainties, and new tools for exploring networks.

astro-ph.IM↗