Sparsity Lower Bounds for Dimensionality Reducing Maps

Jelani Nelson; Huy L. Nguyen

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1211.0995

Sparsity Lower Bounds for Dimensionality Reducing Maps

Jelani Nelson·Huy L. Nguyen

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We give near-tight lower bounds for the sparsity required in several dimensionality reducing linear maps. First, consider the JL lemma which states that for any set of n vectors in R there is a matrix A in R^{m x d} with m = O(eps^{-2}log n) such that mapping by A preserves pairwise Euclidean distances of these n vectors up to a 1 +/- eps factor. We show that there exists a set of n vectors such that any such matrix A with at most s non-zero entries per column must have s = Omega(eps^{-1}log n/log(1/eps)) as long as m < O(n/log(1/eps)). This bound improves the lower bound of Omega(min{eps^{-2}, eps^{-1}sqrt{log_m d}}) by [Dasgupta-Kumar-Sarlos, STOC 2010], which only held against the stronger property of distributional JL, and only against a certain restricted class of distributions. Meanwhile our lower bound is against the JL lemma itself, with no restrictions. Our lower bound matches the sparse Johnson-Lindenstrauss upper bound of [Kane-Nelson, SODA 2012] up to an O(log(1/eps)) factor. Next, we show that any m x n matrix with the k-restricted isometry property (RIP) with constant distortion must have at least Omega(klog(n/k)) non-zeroes per column if the number of the rows is the optimal value m = O(klog (n/k)), and if k < n/polylog n. This improves the previous lower bound of Omega(min{k, n/m}) by [Chandar, 2010] and shows that for virtually all k it is impossible to have a sparse RIP matrix with an optimal number of rows. Lastly, we show that any oblivious distribution over subspace embedding matrices with 1 non-zero per column and preserving all distances in a d dimensional-subspace up to a constant factor with constant probability must have at least Omega(d^2) rows. This matches one of the upper bounds in [Nelson-Nguyen, 2012] and shows the impossibility of obtaining the best of both of constructions in that work, namely 1 non-zero per column and Õ(d) rows.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.IT math.IT

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Jelani Nelson, Huy L. Nguyen. 2012-11-05. Sparsity Lower Bounds for Dimensionality Reducing Maps. https://arxiv.org/abs/1211.0995

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗