arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1211.0285

Addressing Decadal Survey Science through Community Access to Highly Multiplexed Spectroscopy with BigBOSS on the KPNO Mayall Telescope

Caty Pilachowski·Carles Badenes·Stephen Bailey·Aaron Barth·Rachel Beaton·Eric Bell·Rebecca Bernstein·Fuyan Bian·Michael Blanton·Robert Blum·Adam Bolton·Howard Bond·Mark Brodwin·James Bullock·Jeff Carlin·Ranga-Ram Chary·David Cinabro·Michael Cooper·Jorge L. C. Cota·Marc Davis·Kyle Dawson·Arjun Dey·Megan Donahue·Jeremy Drake·Erica Ellingson·Lorenzo Faccioli·Xiaohui Fan·Harry Ferguson·Eric Gawiser·Marla Geha·Mauro Giavalisco·Anthony Gonzalez·Kim Griest·Bruce Grossan·Raja Guhathakurta·Paul Harding·Sara R. Heap·Shirley Ho·Steve Howell·Buell Jannuzi·Jason Kalirai·Brian Keeney·Lisa Kewley·Xu Kong·Michael Lampton·Wei-Peng Lin·Axel de la Macorra·Lucas Macri·Steve Majewski·Paul Martini·Phil Massey·Virginia McSwain·Adam A. Miller·Dante Minniti·Maryam Modjaz·Heather Morrison·John Moustakas·Adam Myers·Joan Najita·Jeffrey Newman·Dara Norman·Knut Olsen·Michael Pierce·Alexandra Pope·Moire Prescott·Naveen Reddy·Kevin Reil·Armin Rest·Katherine Rhode·Connie Rockosi·Greg Rudnick·Abhijit Saha·John Salzer·David Sanders·David Schlegel·Branimir Sesar·Joseph Shields·Jeffrey Silverman·Josh Simon·Adam Stanford·Daniel Stern·Lisa Storrie-Lombardi·Nicholas Suntzeff·Jason Surace·Alex Szalay·Melville Ulmer·Ben Weiner·Beth Willman·Rogier Windhorst·Michael Wood-Vasey
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This document summarizes the results of a community-based discussion of the potential science impact of the Mayall+BigBOSS highly multiplexed multi-object spectroscopic capability. The KPNO Mayall 4m telescope equipped with the DOE- and internationally-funded BigBOSS spectrograph offers one of the most cost-efficient ways of accomplishing many of the pressing scientific goals identified for this decade by the "New Worlds, New Horizons" report. The BigBOSS Key Project will place unprecedented constraints on cosmological parameters related to the expansion history of the universe. With the addition of an open (publicly funded) community access component, the scientific impact of BigBOSS can be extended to many important astrophysical questions related to the origin and evolution of galaxies, stars, and the IGM. Massive spectroscopy is the critical missing ingredient in numerous ongoing and planned ground- and space-based surveys, and BigBOSS is unique in its ability to provide this to the US community. BigBOSS data from community-led projects will play a vital role in the education and training of students and in maintaining US leadership in these fields of astrophysics. We urge the NSF-AST division to support community science with the BigBOSS multi-object spectrograph through the period of the BigBOSS survey in order to ensure public access to the extraordinary spectroscopic capability.

Explore related subjects

astro-ph.COastro-ph.GAastro-ph.IMastro-ph.SR

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Caty Pilachowski, Carles Badenes, Stephen Bailey, Aaron Barth, Rachel Beaton, Eric Bell, Rebecca Bernstein, Fuyan Bian, Michael Blanton, Robert Blum, Adam Bolton, Howard Bond, Mark Brodwin, James Bullock, Jeff Carlin, Ranga-Ram Chary, David Cinabro, Michael Cooper, Jorge L. C. Cota, Marc Davis, Kyle Dawson, Arjun Dey, Megan Donahue, Jeremy Drake, Erica Ellingson, Lorenzo Faccioli, Xiaohui Fan, Harry Ferguson, Eric Gawiser, Marla Geha, Mauro Giavalisco, Anthony Gonzalez, Kim Griest, Bruce Grossan, Raja Guhathakurta, Paul Harding, Sara R. Heap, Shirley Ho, Steve Howell, Buell Jannuzi, Jason Kalirai, Brian Keeney, Lisa Kewley, Xu Kong, Michael Lampton, Wei-Peng Lin, Axel de la Macorra, Lucas Macri, Steve Majewski, Paul Martini, Phil Massey, Virginia McSwain, Adam A. Miller, Dante Minniti, Maryam Modjaz, Heather Morrison, John Moustakas, Adam Myers, Joan Najita, Jeffrey Newman, Dara Norman, Knut Olsen, Michael Pierce, Alexandra Pope, Moire Prescott, Naveen Reddy, Kevin Reil, Armin Rest, Katherine Rhode, Connie Rockosi, Greg Rudnick, Abhijit Saha, John Salzer, David Sanders, David Schlegel, Branimir Sesar, Joseph Shields, Jeffrey Silverman, Josh Simon, Adam Stanford, Daniel Stern, Lisa Storrie-Lombardi, Nicholas Suntzeff, Jason Surace, Alex Szalay, Melville Ulmer, Ben Weiner, Beth Willman, Rogier Windhorst, Michael Wood-Vasey. 2012-11-01. Addressing Decadal Survey Science through Community Access to Highly Multiplexed Spectroscopy with BigBOSS on the KPNO Mayall Telescope. https://arxiv.org/abs/1211.0285

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Constraining spinning primordial black holes with interstellar dust heating

Primordial black holes (PBHs) are a well-motivated dark matter candidate, and their cosmic abundance is constrained by a variety of observational probes. PBHs in the mass range $10^{15}\,\text{g}\,{-}\,10^{17}\,\text{g}$ are evaporating today via Hawking radiation, a process that can heat interstellar dust and modify its thermal emission. Recent studies have used this effect to place constraints on the abundance of non-spinning PBHs. We extend this approach by investigating the influence of PBH spin on dust-heating constraints. Furthermore, we account for secondary photons that originate not only from the decay of gauge bosons but also from the decay of hadrons produced via the fragmentation of primary quarks and gluons emitted through Hawking radiation. By comparing the dust heating rate induced by spinning PBHs with the maximum cooling rate of dust, considering both silicate and graphite grains, we derive new upper limits on the fraction of dark matter in the form of PBHs, $f_{\rm PBH}$. Our results show that the constraints depend on both PBH mass and spin. Smaller PBHs with higher spin yield stronger limits. For example, in the cases we investigated, the strongest constraint is $f_{\rm PBH} \sim 1.5 \times 10^{-4}$ for $M_{\rm PBH} = 10^{15}{\rm g}$ and spin parameter $a_{*} = 0.9999$. Although these limits are less stringent than existing constraints in the same mass range, they provide a distinct and complementary approach to constraining the abundance of PBHs.

astro-ph.CO↗
arXiv2026

Two-parameter continuous deformation of Starobinsky inflation as a bridge between Planck and ACT DESI data with $N_\star\in(50,60)$

We present a family of plateau-type inflationary potentials, eq.~\eqref{Vgeneral}, and analyze a two-parameter $\alpha\beta$-Starobinsky specialization that interpolates continuously between a \emph{maximal} plateau ($V\!\to\!V_0$) and a \emph{submaximal} plateau ($V\!\to\!V_\infty 0$ with $x_\star\gg 1/\beta$ the slow-roll scaling laws change to $n_s\simeq 1-\frac{4}{3N_\star},\, r\simeq\mathcal{C}(\alpha,\beta)\,N_\star^{-4/3},$ with an explicit coefficient $\mathcal{C}(\alpha,\beta)$ set by the plateau truncation. This deformation lifts $n_s$ at fixed $N_\star$ while further suppressing $r$, reconciling the Planck~2018 constraint $n_s=0.9649\pm0.0042$ (68\% CL) and BICEP/Keck18 data $r_{0.05}<0.036$ (95\% CL), with the higher central values $n_s\sim0.97$--$0.98$ preferred by ACT+DESI~DR2 (BAO), within the theoretically motivated interval $N_\star\in(50,60)$ and without exotic reheating. We provide an exact identity for $V/V'$ enabling analytic control of $N_\star$, a practical crossover criterion $\beta\,x_\star\ll1$ vs.\ $\gg1$, and a transparent mapping between $(\alpha,\beta)$ and the observables $(n_s,r,N_\star)$. These yield sharp, testable signatures, particularly the softened $N_\star$-scaling of $r$, that distinguish a maximal from a submaximal plateau with upcoming CMB and LSS data.

astro-ph.CO↗
arXiv2026

A Tale of Two Gauges: Effective Field Theory for Relativistic Behavior of Cosmological Axions

In this work, we present a formalism to model the relativistic behavior of axions. The relativistic behavior of axions is surprisingly difficult to model precisely, as it involves oscillations on timescales much shorter than the Hubble timescale. To overcome this challenge, one typically resorts to some form of effective treatment, focusing only on the time-averaged description of the exact oscillations. Salehian, Namjoo & Kaiser provide a systematic framework for such treatment, based on the effective field theory formalism. While the aforementioned study was formulated for axion perturbations in the Newtonian gauge with no anisotropic stress, we extend the formalism to the synchronous gauge that is more conventionally used for numerical implementation in a realistic cosmological setting. Unlike their work, however, we propose a fluid interpretation in which the axion field can be identified as a perfect fluid at all times, both in the exact and effective regimes. Moreover, we present the effective field theory for the Newtonian gauge with non-zero anisotropic stress, making the original formulation more general and useful for scenarios where the matter content of the universe is multi-component. These results lay the theoretical foundation for a companion paper where we discuss how the axion field should be incorporated alongside other species in common cosmological Boltzmann solvers.

astro-ph.CO↗