arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1210.3426

Deformation Expression for Elements of Algebras (VII) --Vacuum/Pseudo-vacuum Representations--

Hideki Omori·Yoshiaki Maeda·Naoya Miyazaki·Akira Yoshioka
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Thinking back the long history of physics, we see that the calculation used by physicists was nothing but the ordinary calculus. Another word, physicists have never wrote theories beyond the basic axioms of the calculus. This is not to declare of the victory of calculus or algebraic topology. On the contrary, we are thinking that every theory of mathematical physics must suggest new frontier of ordinary calculus, which are never viewed by classical geometers. Weyl algebras or Heisenberg algebras are naturally involved in slightly extended systems of the algebra of ordinary calculus, and are supported by the classical notion of phase spaces on which the general mechanics are based. The theory of deformation quantizations gives a notion of quantization of "phase space". To explain its essence in brief we proposed in the previous note the notion of $μ$-regulated algebra. In this series, we have introduced elements, called "vacuums" to consider the state vectors and the configuration spaces within the world of extended algebra of calculus with various expressions. We have found several strange elements, called polar elements, and an extended notions of vacuums, which were called pseudo-vacuums in our paper. These are not established notions in mathematical physics, but we are thinking that these must propose new frontier for mathematical physics. We are thinking that vacuums and pseudo-vacuums are not unique, but the function algebra of the configuration spaces must be an algebra similar to the Frobenius algebra defined by vacuums. The point in this note is that to obtain classical pictures one has often to restrict the expression parameters, and there are two essentially different expression parameters.

Explore related subjects

math-phmath.MP

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hideki Omori, Yoshiaki Maeda, Naoya Miyazaki, Akira Yoshioka. 2013-03-24. Deformation Expression for Elements of Algebras (VII) --Vacuum/Pseudo-vacuum Representations--. https://arxiv.org/abs/1210.3426

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why we should condition denoising diffusion generative models on windows of past observations

Data assimilation (DA) is, traditionally, a cycling process that relies on time-dependent priors to propagate information from past observations to future cycles. Using denoising diffusion generative modeling for DA is challenging because standard approaches use a fixed training data set, which in turn leads to a static prior that ignores information from past observations. Because past observations are ignored, DA systems with static priors lead to larger posterior errors than cycling DA systems. Incorporating time-dependent priors into generative models, however, requires expensive and frequent retraining. Motivated by linear systems theory - where the dependence of a prediction of a Kalman filter on past observations decays exponentially - we condition diffusion models on short windows of past observations. Specifically, we describe training procedures for two frameworks: a diffusion DA system predicting the current state given a set of past observations, and a diffusion ``direct observation prediction'' (DOP) system, predicting future observations given a set of past observations. Using a canonical linear system, we show that both systems can achieve the minimal posterior error characteristic of a fully-cycled DA/DOP system, without re-training, provided the time windows are long enough. The linear setup ensures analytical tractability, avoids confounding neural network training errors, and confirms that conditioning on windows of past observations is required for efficient and accurate diffusion-based DA or DOP.

math-ph↗
arXiv2026

The kinematic structures and the inertial geometry of a moving charge

We ask how much of the geometry a charged particle moves in is fixed by its motion, and how much a particle must bring. We ask of a symplectic structure only that it relate velocity to momentum as Hamilton's equations do, and we ask it of every energy at once. In particular, we show that the structures meeting that demand are the canonical one and its twists by a closed two-form of the base. A field provides the two-form, a particle the multiplier before it, which we identify constitutively with its charge. Thus, a single energy governs a family of structures, and each particle takes the one its charge fixes. We then ask what a particle must bring to be given a momentum, and we show that the degree of that map settles the degree at which a field enters Newton's Second Law. An antisymmetric bilinear form returns no Lorentz force, whilst a Randers metric returns one --- a length whose difference from a Riemannian one is linear in the velocity. Moreover, we find that metric already within the twisted structure, as its primitive over a level of the free energy, and its law of transport to be nonlinear, no affine connection being known to serve. Under an indefinite signature the length parts from the dynamics, and the extremals turn from shortest to longest. On the round sphere a monopole flux leaves no such metric, whilst the transport remains and prequantisation, given a unit of action, restricts the charge to a lattice. In this manner, we conclude that each charge-to-mass ratio receives a geometry of its own, so that by a functionalist criterion none of them is the spacetime of a charged particle.

math-ph↗