arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1210.0498

The fate of cooperation during range expansions

Kirill S. Korolev
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Cooperation is beneficial for the species as a whole, but, at the level of an individual, defection pays off. Natural selection is then expected to favor defectors and eliminate cooperation. This prediction is in stark contrast with the abundance of cooperation at all levels of biological systems: from cells cooperating to form a biofilm or an organism to ecosystems and human societies. Several explanations have been proposed to resolve this paradox, including direct reciprocity, kin, and group selection. However, our work builds upon an observation that selection on cooperators might depend both on their relative frequency in the population and on the population density. We find that this feedback between the population and evolutionary dynamics can substantially increase the frequency of cooperators at the front of an expanding population, and can even lead to a splitting of cooperators from defectors. After splitting, only cooperators colonize new territories, while defectors slowly invade them from behind. Since range expansions are very common in nature, our work provides a new explanation of the maintenance of cooperation.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.PEphysics.bio-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kirill S. Korolev. 2013-04-28. The fate of cooperation during range expansions. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002994

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Invading activity fronts or near-critical clusters may stabilize vulnerable excitable systems against stochastic trajectories terminating in an absorbing state

Stochastic chemical reaction or population dynamics in finite systems often terminates in an absorbing state. Yet in large spatially extended systems, the time to reach the absorbing configuration (e.g., species extinction or fixation) becomes exceedingly long. Tuning control parameters may effectively diminish the survival probability, rendering active states (species coexistence) susceptible to stochastic extinction events. In inhomogeneous settings, where a vulnerable subsystem is diffusively coupled to an adjacent stable patch, the former is re-activated through influx from the interfaces, provided the vulnerable region either sustains spreading activity fronts or near-critical large active clusters. Either dynamical structure resets the system to correlated initial conditions favorable for survival. We demonstrate this generic elimination of finite-size extinction instabilities via immigration flux in stochastic predator-prey, cyclic competition, and epidemic spreading models.

q-bio.PE↗
arXiv2026

Consensus-level substitution rates are distinct from the virion-level rate

Estimating viral substitution rates is central to evolutionary epidemiology, and recent interest in within-host evolution has sharpened the question of what such rates measure. I distinguish two classes of evolutionary rate estimand that are rarely separated in phylogenetic analysis: the virion-level substitution rate (VLSR), a molecular quantity counting mutational events along lineages, and consensus-level substitution rates (CLSRs), population-summary quantities counting allele frequency threshold crossings from below. CLSRs are indexed by the consensus-generation rule. The VLSR and CLSRs are both biologically meaningful, but not interchangeable. Because the consensus-generation rule defines a given CLSR, it should be reported routinely. This reflection should help analysts make more informed methodological choices when working with sets of virus sequences.

q-bio.PE↗
arXiv2026

The resource cost of cooperative invasion

A contact network can favor cooperation by sheltering a lineage until its descendants compete with defectors as a group. We determine the contact strengths, invasion times and measurement effort needed to realize this advantage at fixed population size. Individuals reproduce according to averaged cooperation payoffs, and offspring replace neighbors through contacts of equal weight in both directions. Contact contrast is the ratio of strongest to weakest contact. Under weak selection on a six-site path, the least contrast needed to favor a single cooperator over the reverse invasion by a defector grows as $656ε^{-2}$ for uniformly placed mutants and $4050ε^{-3}$ for mutations in newborn offspring, as the benefit-cost ratio $b/c=1+ε$ approaches one. The extra power arises because rare replacement protects a site while suppressing mutation arrival there. Global bounds force two weakly coupled groups and exact mirror symmetry of the least-contrast contacts for sufficiently small $ε$. Under uniform introduction, additional contrast shortens the leading mean time to extinction or fixation in the absence of selection, from $12/ε$ toward $6/ε$ reproduction attempts, and eventually breaks the mirror symmetry of the fastest design. Estimating the uniform-introduction advantage from fixation outcomes of independent completed invasions defines a third optimum. Within the six-site family with mirror-symmetric, strongly separated contacts, we optimize contacts and selection strength with reproduction weighted linearly or exponentially by payoff. At fixed relative precision, with contrast a fixed factor above its minimum, the leading summed trial duration grows as $ε^{-3}$. Efficient measurement accepts a smaller advantage in exchange for shorter trials. The cheapest, fastest and most efficiently measured networks therefore differ.

q-bio.PE↗