arXiv · 1209.5192
Probabilistic verifiers for asymmetric debates
Abstract
We examine the power of silent constant-space probabilistic verifiers that watch asymmetric debates (where one side is unable to see some of the messages of the other) between two deterministic provers, and try to determine who is right. We prove that probabilistic verifiers outperform their deterministic counterparts as asymmetric debate checkers. It is shown that the membership problem for every language in NSPACE(s(n)) has a 2^{s(n)}-time debate where one prover is completely blind to the other one, for polynomially bounded space constructible s(n). When partial information is allowed to be seen by the handicapped prover, the class of languages debatable in 2^{s(n)} time contains TIME(2^{s(n)}), so a probabilistic finite automaton can solve any decision problem in P with small error in polynomial time with the aid of such a debate. We also compare our systems with those with a single prover, and with competing-prover interactive proof systems.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
H. Gökalp Demirci, A. C. Cem Say, Abuzer Yakaryılmaz. 2012-09-24. Probabilistic verifiers for asymmetric debates. https://arxiv.org/abs/1209.5192
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.