arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1112.5153

Tight Bounds for Distributed Functional Monitoring

Abstract

We resolve several fundamental questions in the area of distributed functional monitoring, initiated by Cormode, Muthukrishnan, and Yi (SODA, 2008). In this model there are $k$ sites each tracking their input and communicating with a central coordinator that continuously maintain an approximate output to a function $f$ computed over the union of the inputs. The goal is to minimize the communication. We show the randomized communication complexity of estimating the number of distinct elements up to a $1+\eps$ factor is $\tildeΩ(k/\eps^2)$, improving the previous $Ω(k + 1/\eps^2)$ bound and matching known upper bounds up to a logarithmic factor. For the $p$-th frequency moment $F_p$, $p > 1$, we improve the previous $Ω(k + 1/\eps^2)$ communication bound to $\tildeΩ(k^{p-1}/\eps^2)$. We obtain similar improvements for heavy hitters, empirical entropy, and other problems. We also show that we can estimate $F_p$, for any $p > 1$, using $\tilde{O}(k^{p-1}\poly(\eps^{-1}))$ communication. This greatly improves upon the previous $\tilde{O}(k^{2p+1}N^{1-2/p} \poly(\eps^{-1}))$ bound of Cormode, Muthukrishnan, and Yi for general $p$, and their $\tilde{O}(k^2/\eps + k^{1.5}/\eps^3)$ bound for $p = 2$. For $p = 2$, our bound resolves their main open question. Our lower bounds are based on new direct sum theorems for approximate majority, and yield significant improvements to problems in the data stream model, improving the bound for estimating $F_p, p > 2,$ in $t$ passes from $\tildeΩ(n^{1-2/p}/(\eps^{2/p} t))$ to $\tildeΩ(n^{1-2/p}/(\eps^{4/p} t))$, giving the first bound for estimating $F_0$ in $t$ passes of $Ω(1/(\eps^2 t))$ bits of space that does not use the gap-hamming problem.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

David P. Woodruff, Qin Zhang. 2013-06-12. Tight Bounds for Distributed Functional Monitoring. https://arxiv.org/abs/1112.5153

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS