arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1111.6164

Standing genetic variation and the evolution of drug resistance in HIV

Pleuni S. Pennings
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Drug resistance remains a major problem for the treatment of HIV. Resistance can occur due to mutations that were present before treatment starts or due to mutations that occur during treatment. The relative importance of these two sources is unknown. We study three different situations in which HIV drug resistance may evolve: starting triple-drug therapy, treatment with a single dose of nevirapine and interruption of treatment. For each of these three cases good data are available from literature, which allows us to estimate the probability that resistance evolves from standing genetic variation. Depending on the treatment we find probabilities of the evolution of drug resistance due to standing genetic variation between 0 and 39%. For patients who start triple-drug combination therapy, we find that drug resistance evolves from standing genetic variation in approximately 6% of the patients. We use a population-dynamic and population-genetic model to understand the observations and to estimate important evolutionary parameters. We find that both, the effective population size of the virus before treatment, and the fitness of the resistant mutant during treatment, are key-parameters that determine the probability that resistance evolves from standing genetic variation. Importantly, clinical data indicate that both of these parameters can be manipulated by the kind of treatment that is used.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.PEq-bio.GN

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Pleuni S. Pennings. 2011-11-26. Standing genetic variation and the evolution of drug resistance in HIV. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002527

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

How deterministic trajectories and their fluctuations underlie allele-frequency statistics in the strong-selection regime

We determine statistics of allele-frequency trajectories across replicate populations. Defining $R = 2N_e|s|$ where $N_e$ is the effective population size and $s$ is the additive selection coefficient of a focal allele, we focus on strong selection which corresponds to $R \gg 1$. Strong selection does not require large selection coefficients: in populations of realistic size, it can readily arise from small selection coefficients. Our analysis concerns a biallelic locus over timescales on which mutation can be neglected. Every allele-frequency trajectory belongs to one of two absorbing classes: fixation or loss. When $R$ is large, individual allele-frequency trajectories can appear nearly deterministic. This does not imply that an approximation of allele-frequency statistics can be based on a single deterministic trajectory. For a beneficial allele, the deterministic trajectory approaches fixation, yet a non-negligible fraction of stochastic trajectories may be lost. Ignoring trajectories that achieve loss can produce severely erroneous statistics. We address this by conditioning separately on the eventual loss and eventual fixation of the focal allele. This yields an outcome-conditioned representation of a statistic. In the strong-selection regime, we apply a small-noise expansion that reasonably captures transient behaviours of statistics while recovering their exact long-time limits. We illustrate results with numerical examples for the mean allele frequency and its variance. The biological interpretation of this work is that, even under strong selection, both trajectory types are of importance. We provide a simple framework for calculating time-dependent allele-frequency statistics relevant to experimental evolution, longitudinal population-genomic data, and the dynamics of alleles driving selective sweeps.

q-bio.PE↗
arXiv2026

Life Finds A Way: Emergence of Cooperative Structures in Adaptive Threshold Networks

There has been a long debate on how new levels of organization have evolved. It might seem unlikely, as cooperation must prevail over competition. One well-studied example is the emergence of autocatalytic sets, which seem to be a prerequisite for the evolution of life. Using a simple model, we investigate how varying bias toward cooperation versus antagonism shapes network dynamics, revealing that higher-order organization emerges even amid pervasive antagonistic interactions. In general, we observe that a quantitative increase in the number of elements in a system leads to a qualitative transition. We present a random threshold-directed network model that integrates node-specific traits with dynamic edge formation and node removal, simulating arbitrary levels of cooperation and competition. In our framework, intrinsic node values determine directed links through various threshold rules. Our model generates a multi-digraph with signed edges (reflecting support/antagonism, labeled ``help''/``harm''), which ultimately yields two parallel yet interdependent threshold graphs. Incorporating temporal growth and node turnover in our approach allows exploration of the evolution, adaptation, and potential collapse of communities and reveals regime changes in both connectivity and resilience. Our findings extend classical random threshold and Erdős-Rényi models, offering new insights into adaptive systems in biological and economic contexts, with emphasis on the application to Collective Affordance Sets. This framework should also be useful for making predictions that will be tested by ongoing experiments of microbial communities in soil.

q-bio.PE↗
arXiv2026

Outbreak dynamics and population vulnerability in stochastic epidemic models on networks

During infectious disease epidemics, pathogen transmission occurs in host populations made up of interacting subpopulations. Using stochastic simulation and analytical approximations, we examine how outbreak sizes in networked populations depend on network architecture, subpopulation sizes and the strength of coupling between subpopulations. We find, as expected, that mean outbreak sizes are frequently lower in networked populations than in homogeneous populations with the same basic reproduction number. However, after an outbreak ends, a networked population is often vulnerable to further outbreaks, and the ending of an outbreak may not imply herd immunity in any sense. Another key finding is that a relatively small amount of randomly distributed prior immunity can be more protective in a networked population than a homogeneous population, a phenomenon which can be reproduced analytically in certain cases. We also find that in networked populations, randomly distributed prior immunity is often more protective than infection-acquired immunity; but this conclusion can be reversed in populations with highly variable susceptibility. All of these conclusions have implications for designing outbreak control strategies that aim to reduce pathogen transmission during epidemics.

q-bio.PE↗