arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1109.6273

Structural focalization

Robert J. Simmons
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Focusing, introduced by Jean-Marc Andreoli in the context of classical linear logic, defines a normal form for sequent calculus derivations that cuts down on the number of possible derivations by eagerly applying invertible rules and grouping sequences of non-invertible rules. A focused sequent calculus is defined relative to some non-focused sequent calculus; focalization is the property that every non-focused derivation can be transformed into a focused derivation. In this paper, we present a focused sequent calculus for propositional intuitionistic logic and prove the focalization property relative to a standard presentation of propositional intuitionistic logic. Compared to existing approaches, the proof is quite concise, depending only on the internal soundness and completeness of the focused logic. In turn, both of these properties can be established (and mechanically verified) by structural induction in the style of Pfenning's structural cut elimination without the need for any tedious and repetitious invertibility lemmas. The proof of cut admissibility for the focused system, which establishes internal soundness, is not particularly novel. The proof of identity expansion, which establishes internal completeness, is a major contribution of this work.

Explore related subjects

cs.LO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Robert J. Simmons. 2014-03-17. Structural focalization. https://doi.org/10.1145/2629678

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Formal Verification of Proofs from Automated Theorem Provers for Higher-Order Logic

We identify common challenges and requirements for verifying proofs from automated theorem provers in the Dedukti logical framework and develop a general methodology for deriving encodings of calculus rules and proof steps, including clausification. We then apply this methodology to the EP calculus for higher-order logic and integrate it into the automated theorem prover Leo-III. The resulting prototype reconstructs about 80% of generated proof steps automatically, making Leo-III the first higher-order automated theorem prover to support independently checkable proof reconstruction and providing a basis for cross-system reuse. The implementation uncovered several bugs in Leo-III.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2026

Arithmetics within the Linear Time Hierarchy

We identify fragments of the arithmetic $S_1$ that enjoy nice closure properties and have exact characterization of their definable multifunctions. To do this, in the language of $S_1$, $L_1$, starting from the formula classes, $Σ^{\mathsf b}_{i}$, which ignore sharply bounded quantifiers when determining quantifier alternations, we define new syntactic classes by counting bounded existential sharply bounded universal quantifiers blocks. Using these, we define arithmetics: $\breve{S}^{i}_{1}$, $TLS^i_1$ and $TSC^i_1$. $\breve{S}^{i}_{1}$ consists of open axioms for the language symbols and length induction for one of our new classes, $SIUT_{i,1}^{\{p(|id|)\}}$. $TLS^i_1$ and $TSC^i_1$ are defined using axioms related to dependent choice sequences for formulas from two other classes within $Σ^{\mathsf b}_{i}$. We prove for $i \geq 1$ that $$TLS^i_1 \subseteq TSC^i_1 \subseteq \breve{S}^{i}_{1} \preceq_{\forall B(SITT_{i+1}^{\{p(|id|)\}})} TLS^{i+1}_1$$ and that the $SITT_{i}^{\{p(|id|)\}}$-definable in $TLS^i_1$ (resp. $SITT_{i}^{\{2^{p(||id||)}\}}$-definable in $TSC^i_1$) multifunctions are $L_1$-$FLOGSPACE^{SIT_{i,1}}[wit]$ (resp. $L_1$-$FSC^{SIT_{i,1}}[wit]$). These multifunction classes are respectively the logspace or $SC$ (poly-time, polylog-space) computable multifunctions whose output is bound by a term in $L_1$ and that have access to a witness oracle for another restriction on the $Σ^{\mathsf b}_{i}$ formulas, $SIT_{i,1}$. For the $i=1$ cases, this simplifies respectively to the functions in logspace and $SC$, Steve's Class, poly-time, polylog-space. We prove independence results related to the Matiyasevich Robinson Davis Putnam Theorem (MRDP) and to whether our theories prove simultaneous nondeterministic polynomial time, sublinear space is equal to co-nondeterministic polynomial time, sublinear space.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2026

TREBL -- A Relative Complete Temporal Event-B Logic. Part I: Theory

The verification of liveness conditions is an important aspect of state-based rigorous methods. This article addresses the extension of the logic of Event-B to a powerful logic, in which properties of traces of an Event-B machine can be expressed. However, all formulae of this logic are still interpreted over states of an Event-B machine rather than traces. The logic exploits that for an Event-B machine $M$ a state $S$ determines all traces of $M$ starting in $S$. We identify a fragment called TREBL of this logic, in which all liveness conditions of interest can be expressed, and define a set of sound derivation rules for the fragment. We further show relative completeness of these derivation rules in the sense that for every valid entailment of a formula $φ$ one can find a derivation, provided the machine $M$ is sufficiently refined. The decisive property is that certain variant terms must be definable in the refined machine. We show that such refinements always exist. Throughout the article several examples from the field of security are used to illustrate the theory.

cs.LO↗