Upside Down Magic, Bimagic, Palindromic Squares and Pythagoras Theorem on a Palindromic Day - 11.02.2011

Inder Jeet Taneja

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1102.2394

Upside Down Magic, Bimagic, Palindromic Squares and Pythagoras Theorem on a Palindromic Day - 11.02.2011

Inder Jeet Taneja

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this short paper we have produced different kinds of upside down magic squares based on a palindromic day 11.02.2011. In this day appear only the algorisms 0, 1 and 2. Some of the magic squares are bimagic and some are palindromic. Magic sums of the magic squares of order 3x3, 4x4 and 5x5 satisfies the Pythagoras theorem. Bimagic squares of order 9x9 are produced with 4, 6 and 8 digits. The bimagic square of order 9x9 with 8 digits is of palindromic numbers. We have given bimagic squares of order 16x16 and 25x25, where the magic sum S1 in both the cases is same. In order to make these magic squares upside down, i.e., 180 degrees rotation, we have used the numbers in the digital form. All these magic square are only with three digits, 0, 1 and 2 appearing in the day 11.02.2011.

Explore related subjects

math.HO

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Inder Jeet Taneja. 2011-02-14. Upside Down Magic, Bimagic, Palindromic Squares and Pythagoras Theorem on a Palindromic Day - 11.02.2011. https://arxiv.org/abs/1102.2394

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO↗

arXiv2026

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO↗

arXiv2026

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO↗