arXiv · 1010.4161
Reply to Comment on Reply to Comment on `Perfect imaging without negative refraction'
Abstract
Kinsler and Favaro point out correctly that Blaikie's numerical solution of Maxwell's equations in Maxwell's fish eye is causal and hence valid, a solution where no perfect image is formed. It is wrong to conclude from the existence of a causal solution with perfect imaging that one without perfect resolution is not causal; both are allowed by causality. However, Maxwell's fish eye can still perfectly image, as the Reply shows.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Ulf Leonhardt. 2010-10-20. Reply to Comment on Reply to Comment on `Perfect imaging without negative refraction'. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/13/2/028002
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.